From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162C11C9B77 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728385184; cv=none; b=BIrStpI7Sc2JWZn3y4rZ5nKybAw77cy4g/kP2cwW15DOhjK1lPDRggszFdHYW86div491LB8qQ85tKo9s3ZSBC6oK9G3RYtEE3kUTboNJmzCQ/iUDSUEMCYkv+56Bp5/m8QqP/SDRrgHovHaKt3n3Z1B/npc223h++tCIunGe+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728385184; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zeUqvI7SPlfEDQRc680LktQNkR1koKFBn87cj8I1z5E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=dFKX7QnaFAXp01OGTOsoCA5tK2rUe9FCYwAWBDHJk129wH0XQp032ANOxN9pK7/FoJTE8lYq06XwBM9YFdCXJCW/y/6sYbShN/1e3Neaj/9lbLsXGoO7cVxNHtOkRY61kRnEkwmsP9ow8fOUT4MH72pXPhWSwte/9kjeNQxYXQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=iGCQ6NPv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="iGCQ6NPv" Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4989Juau020507; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=pp1; bh= 4A8DJyWg8LQ+N4AyllITtSSlkQcxiPJBfcJryBouwNw=; b=iGCQ6NPvXDS1rNyW E6O4S/UM3bGpjThxzuzn/CT/+jJ5uwSI3upOn+Bb8jK2LW5jWYz2kFkUvN02mBrh uX1QuXrwtxrStlfiBwxMRs72vBeVtNcyeIWBuJYzaM89/nxj9ZtIEJuTJjdJ28Hp y/InN8D+QBpDvKjuA2Nk/3UI0IlGPVgBhY4pTJY4WlPASG5UMwLiZnR841fzs6Yt j07YJRa2I1S0N5VVNmG3jqW2bfq1liE2o0QN+1Biie09Io4NTJXXir6ii9N1y/vf LNLPRV+rPMj/OOFEwgZvozygUwyn/O4aVF/7Se+L+RlJF3SemQg871GrZpK6Seac FmZkuA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42520hggw6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:59:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0356516.ppops.net (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 498Awb8d021450; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:37 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42520hggw4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:59:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4989FaVT011516; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:37 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 423g5xkx7c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:59:37 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 498AxXN542271164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:33 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5BE2004D; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AEC20043; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-ce58cfcc-320b-11b2-a85c-85e19b5285e0 (unknown [9.179.3.110]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:59:30 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: "Marc Hartmayer" Cc: Cornelia Huck , Eric Farman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , "Martin K. Petersen" , Robin Murphy , Ulf Hansson , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/virtio_ccw: fix dma_parm pointer not set up Message-ID: <20241008125930.33578456.pasic@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <875xq3yo97.fsf@linux.ibm.com> References: <20241007201030.204028-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <875xq3yo97.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0olIk7itJFa692_e9qiWOsWSRvlhRHRt X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ZOgQRSixwEq07pQDdsufZ9psI2fkElxs Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-08_09,2024-10-08_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=647 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410080066 On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:47:48 +0200 "Marc Hartmayer" wrote: > > Closes: https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209131 > > I guess, this line can be removed as it’s internal only. checkpatch.pl complains about the Reported-by if I do. It does not complain about Closes: N/A but if I read the process documentation correctly if the report is not available on the web Closes should be omitted: """ Using Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and report them and it hopefully inspires them to help us again in the future. The tag is intended for bugs; please do not use it to credit feature requests. The tag should be followed by a Closes: tag pointing to the report, unless the report is not available on the web. """ So I guess I have to make peace with getting checkpatch warnings when I give credits to the reporter for reports not available on the web. Regards, Halil