From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84901D318A; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728571274; cv=none; b=clGsCr8+QByIXFl7bkhxkhxxWXPqBb+iDNWjXpteykJwGB1QNIJ1fN+vqx6fb+zEY0Lse2er3CEdmxg6pEtgUTRpD0KGVOufptZuvd4K+19PSeJR4WJOQlmhyijqZSOG2yRuYd1+ZlZCvKhYNCdIZtyUkM/elt5YlswgRx4znk0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728571274; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lz71XzaNG0yVrDt1WTunslV5rf5BbFvnhf2NJVOJ3ro=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VvGSSPy5z9K8VlYXnXWCajfomBwITrMGa6jhqd4DCkaeG5vvrArsB1OMm+xlbExM2hqQrCrT2Ax1QnbRBusb5X/1ACVCDCPLWEKtI+GV+ahXE8R581vJkT4Kem3uMHGHGIvFLGM9druVkcFoWm2I9gOoMMhnOipLey/Sm6ZB8zY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=oMM+hHbx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="oMM+hHbx" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49ADKFFj031559; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:08 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=KJ7obiUQsc0gi7rSB7YbRqDTUNO qFh295ecCfP3r4I8=; b=oMM+hHbxJFu0iKt3zidRaax35B+5x8abmMvcNFO+Krh I8lKdN9A51Y4+ki5aCJg3tgn6U5h8e+fU4OqO1J4W9hNX31R725fxL2Rsj2+aBm5 l+5g2suew6UiCHmqxgVjPWPKuVOgxBoTsXqfcl9VjQZkUyEQkgzS1AWo63c8hru2 QI1sBnOd93B6kb61ffyHeFh1yF9HQh8+SZWGF4LJ3dWPxZ1EZQ3YSZ4qap7sIf5r pVvOccAm6SxBx41nBCZhNtnRHsDJQzRmETlX8J0vi/9Qt2uEJ2WOmfu/7TAlLvgQ jYIefjS30z6jbVLg2bOrLHqcdAZN1THeYdwFoRMJSag== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 426fqk8er7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 49AEbb81000832; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:07 GMT Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 426fqk8eqw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49AE1d5O022867; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:06 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 423jg17yug-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:06 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 49AEf3nj20906356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:03 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003EE2004B; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD11620040; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.60]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 16:41:01 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Mario Casquero , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Thomas Huth , Cornelia Huck , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] virtio-mem: s390x support Message-ID: <20241010144101.15346-C-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240910191541.2179655-1-david@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: EE3Dkc8rCcd301tXUOjUXD5mTbEF83eP X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: tuVe5hxUbXesJKRGXR5xf0cDEAn-KsaD X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-10_11,2024-10-10_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=713 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410100097 On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 02:31:31PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 10.10.24 10:41, Mario Casquero wrote: > > This series has been successfully tested along with the QEMU's series. > > Virtio-mem devices could be resized, plugged and unplugged seamlessly. > > The memory information displayed is correct and reboot doesn't cause > > any issue. > > > > Tested-by: Mario Casquero > > Thanks a bunch for testing! > > If there are no more comments, I'll add the in-tree kernel update for the > new diag500 subcall and resend. Sorry that you haven't seen any review from here yet, but... :) Please also change all usages of "s390x" to "s390" before you resend. Within the kernel usage of s390x is not common and there shouldn't be anything like this added.