From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"eperezma@redhat.com" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost-vdpa: Add support for NO-IOMMU mode
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 20:16:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241019201059-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxCrqPPbidzZb6w1@infradead.org>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:16:08PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:41:51PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > It's basically because vfio does, so we have to follow suit.
>
> That's a very bold argument, especially without any rationale of
>
> a) why you need to match the feature set
Because people want to move from some vendor specific solution with vfio
to a standard vdpa compatible one with vdpa.
We could just block them since we don't support tainted kernels anyway,
but it's a step in the right direction since it allows moving to
virtio, and the kernel is tained so no big support costs (although
qe costs do exist, as with any code).
> b) how even adding it to vfio was agood idea
That ship has sailed.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-20 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 14:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost-vdpa: Add support for NO-IOMMU mode Srujana Challa
2024-09-20 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost-vdpa: introduce module parameter for no-IOMMU mode Srujana Challa
2024-09-21 17:28 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-20 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost-vdpa: introduce NO-IOMMU backend feature bit Srujana Challa
2024-09-24 7:43 ` Jason Wang
2024-09-24 10:01 ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2024-10-01 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost-vdpa: Add support for NO-IOMMU mode Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 13:18 ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2024-10-15 3:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16 17:28 ` Srujana Challa
2024-10-17 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-17 8:53 ` Srujana Challa
2024-10-18 4:54 ` Jason Wang
2024-10-18 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 13:08 ` Srujana Challa
2024-10-16 17:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-10-17 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-20 0:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-10-23 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-23 8:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-10-24 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-06 12:38 ` Srujana Challa
2024-11-06 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-07 6:08 ` Srujana Challa
2024-11-12 7:11 ` Srujana Challa
2024-11-06 18:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-11-06 18:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241019201059-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).