From: Ferry Meng <mengferry@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ferry Meng <mengferry@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support.
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:24:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241218092435.21671-1-mengferry@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
This patchset implements io_uring passthrough surppot in virtio-blk
driver, bypass vfs and part of block layer logic, resulting in lower
submit latency and increased flexibility when utilizing virtio-blk.
In this version, currently only supports READ/WRITE vec/no-vec operations,
others like discard or zoned ops not considered in. So the userspace-related
struct is not complicated.
struct virtblk_uring_cmd {
__u32 type;
__u32 ioprio;
__u64 sector;
/* above is related to out_hdr */
__u64 data; // user buffer addr or iovec base addr.
__u32 data_len; // user buffer length or iovec count.
__u32 flag; // only contains whether a vector rw or not.
};
To test this patch series, I changed fio's code:
1. Added virtio-blk support to engines/io_uring.c.
2. Added virtio-blk support to the t/io_uring.c testing tool.
Link: https://github.com/jdmfr/fio
===========
Performance
===========
Using t/io_uring-vblk, the performance of virtio-blk based on uring-cmd
scales better than block device access. (such as below, Virtio-Blk with QEMU,
1-depth fio)
(passthru) read: IOPS=17.2k, BW=67.4MiB/s (70.6MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=2907, max=43592, avg=3981.87, stdev=595.10
clat (usec): min=38, max=285,avg=53.47, stdev= 8.28
lat (usec): min=44, max=288, avg=57.45, stdev= 8.28
(block) read: IOPS=15.3k, BW=59.8MiB/s (62.7MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=3408, max=35366, avg=5102.17, stdev=790.79
clat (usec): min=35, max=343, avg=59.63, stdev=10.26
lat (usec): min=43, max=349, avg=64.73, stdev=10.21
Testing the virtio-blk device with fio using 'engines=io_uring_cmd'
and 'engines=io_uring' also demonstrates improvements in submit latency.
(passthru) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/vdcc0
IOPS=189.80K, BW=741MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=187.68K, BW=733MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
(block) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u0 /dev/vdc
IOPS=101.51K, BW=396MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=100.01K, BW=390MiB/s, IOS/call=4/4
=======
Changes
=======
Changes in v1:
--------------
* remove virtblk_is_write() helper
* fix rq_flags type definition (blk_opf_t), add REQ_ALLOC_CACHE flag.
https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/202412042324.uKQ5KdkE-lkp@intel.com/
RFC discussion:
---------------
https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20241203121424.19887-1-mengferry@linux.alibaba.com/
Ferry Meng (3):
virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support.
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 320 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 16 ++
2 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 9:24 Ferry Meng [this message]
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support Ferry Meng
2024-12-30 7:47 ` Joseph Qi
2025-01-07 4:53 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev Ferry Meng
2024-12-30 8:00 ` Joseph Qi
2025-01-07 13:14 ` lizetao
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support Ferry Meng
2025-01-09 17:27 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-02-19 2:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-02-26 11:10 ` Ferry Meng
2025-02-27 6:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241218092435.21671-1-mengferry@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=mengferry@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).