From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Zhenzhong Duan" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Hongyu Ning" <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: Remove virtio devices on device_shutdown()
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 06:55:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250131065357-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc7312ca-2745-48a5-a5ac-9ee1d1c4bee0@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:53:15AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Kirill, Michael
>
> On 8/8/24 9:51 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Hongyu reported a hang on kexec in a VM. QEMU reported invalid memory
> > accesses during the hang.
> >
> > Invalid read at addr 0x102877002, size 2, region '(null)', reason: rejected
> > Invalid write at addr 0x102877A44, size 2, region '(null)', reason: rejected
> > ...
> >
> > It was traced down to virtio-console. Kexec works fine if virtio-console
> > is not in use.
> >
> > Looks like virtio-console continues to write to the MMIO even after
> > underlying virtio-pci device is removed.
> >
> > The problem can be mitigated by removing all virtio devices on virtio
> > bus shutdown.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Reported-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
>
> Gentle ping on that patch that seems to have fallen though the cracks.
>
> I think this fix is really needed. I have another test case with a
> rebooting guest exposed with virtio-net (backed by vhost-net) and
> viommu. Since there is currently no shutdown for the virtio-net, on
> reboot, the IOMMU is disabled through the native_machine_shutdown()/
> x86_platform.iommu_shutdown() while the virtio-net is still alive.
>
> Normally device_shutdown() should call virtio-net shutdown before the
> IOMMU tear down and we wouldn't see any spurious transactions after
> iommu shutdown.
>
> With that fix, the above test case is fixed and I do not see spurious
> vhost IOTLB miss spurious requests.
>
> For more details, see qemu thread ([PATCH] hw/virtio/vhost: Disable
> IOTLB callbacks when IOMMU gets disabled,
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250120173339.865681-1-eric.auger@redhat.com/)
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
OK I'll re-review. Thanks!
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > index a9b93e99c23a..6c2f908eb22c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > @@ -356,6 +356,15 @@ static void virtio_dev_remove(struct device *_d)
> > of_node_put(dev->dev.of_node);
> > }
> >
> > +static void virtio_dev_shutdown(struct device *_d)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_device *dev = dev_to_virtio(_d);
> > + struct virtio_driver *drv = drv_to_virtio(dev->dev.driver);
> > +
> > + if (drv && drv->remove)
> > + drv->remove(dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct bus_type virtio_bus = {
> > .name = "virtio",
> > .match = virtio_dev_match,
> > @@ -363,6 +372,7 @@ static const struct bus_type virtio_bus = {
> > .uevent = virtio_uevent,
> > .probe = virtio_dev_probe,
> > .remove = virtio_dev_remove,
> > + .shutdown = virtio_dev_shutdown,
> > };
> >
> > int __register_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver *driver, struct module *owner)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-08 7:51 [PATCH] virtio: Remove virtio devices on device_shutdown() Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-08-08 11:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-08-08 12:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-08-08 15:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-08-08 12:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-08 13:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-08-08 15:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-08 15:28 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-11-04 10:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-31 9:53 ` Eric Auger
2025-01-31 11:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-02-03 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-02-04 11:46 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-06 8:59 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-06 10:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-02-06 16:27 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-14 7:21 ` Ning, Hongyu
2025-02-14 7:56 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-14 12:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-02-17 3:29 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-17 7:49 ` Ning, Hongyu
2025-02-17 9:25 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-17 16:59 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-17 23:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-02-17 23:57 ` Ning, Hongyu
2025-02-18 0:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-02-18 1:49 ` Ning, Hongyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250131065357-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).