From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1AC25A2B5; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741285309; cv=none; b=Co7ydYKIdIhSdotx7T5NEbXwvxTY/o09HjLSKgO0qr1Pcj2TU1L2svf3EfjXFjOdXP4YWgr10fRXimqevTVAtj/5GrHFL0IQwX92qdzmigejFElKTT3CCAakIa3oPmSAqL0RBTcvXtdFHSM/ygIaoSWHjJxGlMbXwR8YR3ho8Ew= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741285309; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qXRgkDyjGR8YLzfH/EKdzyabtiSvlRyjtiG3fHLKk7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CygX+g/C5TYOBTyIjMO9oqtxrIdtCk9vVwGmYcm5CqbDU70nFrmuf1UTaa3MfppVd3+ohrot9DdTCmKm9hbCsmpc8hNKfRhLcRr9xPL4o40JgYmQJ2Jvo2MdCtSjgjkKgUwbwqHLozrvq41UHt8zdKYU3boXyMJy4sIMw0fxCRc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DLuDa/Z1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DLuDa/Z1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8F60C4CEE0; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:21:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741285308; bh=qXRgkDyjGR8YLzfH/EKdzyabtiSvlRyjtiG3fHLKk7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DLuDa/Z13r8gWyfbZW9sHlgJAvyq/tN6kRHxVtD9dr/VItOtk6fnEfLRISWEESOzo Y1se2INMUgyehchnK68nRHYfDRbG5/r6HA8JlhbFiNQ8ynwjCu3BzOzAotkKy+5LKE bx4luz3TGG47gfz6WNDA9zaWJFTuzALSotQnh848EeITSMvYX8tLerwhK34ylSxchF yLCIQ99RvHHThYOwTm9HkNxSqnmBbMwgRwW/yuVbgiWt8sI4ySz9lq2VVC/FH3pThX ag6wxPZQFlIdZKHoZVTrNH85OpSIjumUc/Wudw/vvl7o8eJ2vQxGAX8FfaDXIsMjtk qswTG7ztiDLYA== Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:21:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Joe Damato Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, gerhard@engleder-embedded.com, jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, mst@redhat.com, leiyang@redhat.com, Eugenio =?UTF-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , "open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio-net: Map NAPIs to queues Message-ID: <20250306102146.70803a61@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250227185017.206785-1-jdamato@fastly.com> <20250227185017.206785-4-jdamato@fastly.com> <20250228182759.74de5bec@kernel.org> <20250303160355.5f8d82d8@kernel.org> <20250305182118.3d885f0d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:00:02 -0800 Joe Damato wrote: > + * - wrap all of the work in a lock (perhaps vi->refill_lock?) > + * - check netif_running() and return early to avoid a race > + */ probably netdev instance lock is better here, as it will also protect the return value of netif_running(). IOW we need to base the "is the device up" test on some state that's protected by the lock we take.