public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	acme@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
	ajay.kaher@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, luto@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com,
	dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to <asm/tsc.h>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 02:20:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427092027.1598740-3-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427092027.1598740-1-xin@zytor.com>

For some reason, there are some TSC-related functions in the MSR
header even though there is a tsc.h header.

Relocate rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h> to <asm/tsc.h>, and
subsequently remove the inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>.

Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---

Change in v4:
*) Add missing includes in a different patch (Ilpo Järvinen).

Change in v3:
* Add a problem statement to the changelog (Dave Hansen).
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 54 ---------------------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 72a9ebc99078..2caa13830e11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -170,60 +170,6 @@ native_write_msr_safe(u32 msr, u32 low, u32 high)
 extern int rdmsr_safe_regs(u32 regs[8]);
 extern int wrmsr_safe_regs(u32 regs[8]);
 
-/**
- * rdtsc() - returns the current TSC without ordering constraints
- *
- * rdtsc() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.  The
- * only ordering constraint it supplies is the ordering implied by
- * "asm volatile": it will put the RDTSC in the place you expect.  The
- * CPU can and will speculatively execute that RDTSC, though, so the
- * results can be non-monotonic if compared on different CPUs.
- */
-static __always_inline u64 rdtsc(void)
-{
-	DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
-
-	asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
-
-	return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
-}
-
-/**
- * rdtsc_ordered() - read the current TSC in program order
- *
- * rdtsc_ordered() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.
- * It is ordered like a load to a global in-memory counter.  It should
- * be impossible to observe non-monotonic rdtsc_unordered() behavior
- * across multiple CPUs as long as the TSC is synced.
- */
-static __always_inline u64 rdtsc_ordered(void)
-{
-	DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
-
-	/*
-	 * The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
-	 * access.  The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
-	 * point, but empirically an RDTSC instruction can be
-	 * speculatively executed before prior loads.  An RDTSC
-	 * immediately after an appropriate barrier appears to be
-	 * ordered as a normal load, that is, it provides the same
-	 * ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
-	 * that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
-	 * time stamp.
-	 *
-	 * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
-	 * RDTSCP as the default.
-	 */
-	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2("rdtsc",
-				   "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
-				   "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
-			: EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
-			/* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
-			:: "ecx");
-
-	return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
-}
-
 static inline u64 native_read_pmc(int counter)
 {
 	DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
index 94408a784c8e..13335a130edf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -7,7 +7,81 @@
 
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+/*
+ * both i386 and x86_64 returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, but gcc's "A"
+ * constraint has different meanings. For i386, "A" means exactly
+ * edx:eax, while for x86_64 it doesn't mean rdx:rax or edx:eax. Instead,
+ * it means rax *or* rdx.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+/* Using 64-bit values saves one instruction clearing the high half of low */
+#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high)	unsigned long low, high
+#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high)	((low) | (high) << 32)
+#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)	"=a" (low), "=d" (high)
+#else
+#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high)	u64 val
+#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high)	(val)
+#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)	"=A" (val)
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * rdtsc() - returns the current TSC without ordering constraints
+ *
+ * rdtsc() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.  The
+ * only ordering constraint it supplies is the ordering implied by
+ * "asm volatile": it will put the RDTSC in the place you expect.  The
+ * CPU can and will speculatively execute that RDTSC, though, so the
+ * results can be non-monotonic if compared on different CPUs.
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 rdtsc(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
+	asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
+
+	return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
+}
+
+/**
+ * rdtsc_ordered() - read the current TSC in program order
+ *
+ * rdtsc_ordered() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.
+ * It is ordered like a load to a global in-memory counter.  It should
+ * be impossible to observe non-monotonic rdtsc_unordered() behavior
+ * across multiple CPUs as long as the TSC is synced.
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 rdtsc_ordered(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
+	/*
+	 * The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
+	 * access.  The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
+	 * point, but empirically an RDTSC instruction can be
+	 * speculatively executed before prior loads.  An RDTSC
+	 * immediately after an appropriate barrier appears to be
+	 * ordered as a normal load, that is, it provides the same
+	 * ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
+	 * that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
+	 * time stamp.
+	 *
+	 * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
+	 * RDTSCP as the default.
+	 */
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2("rdtsc",
+				   "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
+				   "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
+			: EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
+			/* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
+			:: "ecx");
+
+	return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
+}
+
+#undef DECLARE_ARGS
+#undef EAX_EDX_VAL
+#undef EAX_EDX_RET
 
 /*
  * Standard way to access the cycle counter.
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-27  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-27  9:20 [PATCH v4 00/15] MSR code cleanup part one Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] x86/msr: Add missing includes of <asm/msr.h> Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-29  9:45   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-29 17:27     ` Xin Li
2025-04-30  4:20     ` Michael Kelley
2025-04-30  9:12       ` Xin Li
2025-04-30  8:41     ` Xin Li
2025-04-30  9:17       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-30 17:34         ` Xin Li
2025-05-01  5:42     ` [PATCH v4A " Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02 13:13       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-02 17:50         ` Xin Li
2025-04-27  9:20 ` Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2025-05-02  8:02   ` [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to <asm/tsc.h> Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:09     ` Xin Li
2025-05-02  8:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:01     ` Xin Li
2025-05-02  8:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:00     ` Xin Li
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] x86/msr: Remove rdpmc() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] x86/msr: Rename rdpmcl() to rdpmc() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] x86/msr: Convert the rdpmc() macro into an always inline function Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] x86/xen/msr: Return u64 consistently in Xen PMC read functions Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] x86/msr: Convert __wrmsr() uses to native_wrmsr{,q}() uses Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] x86/msr: Add the native_rdmsrq() helper Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] x86/msr: Convert __rdmsr() uses to native_rdmsrq() uses Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove calling native_{read,write}_msr{,_safe}() in pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02  8:30   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove the error pointer argument from set_seg() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] x86/pvops/msr: refactor pv_cpu_ops.write_msr{,_safe}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] x86/msr: Replace wrmsr(msr, low, 0) with wrmsrq(msr, low) Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] x86/msr: Change the function type of native_read_msr_safe() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02 14:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] MSR code cleanup part one Michael Kelley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250427092027.1598740-3-xin@zytor.com \
    --to=xin@zytor.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox