From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
acme@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
peterz@infradead.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
ajay.kaher@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com, luto@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to <asm/tsc.h>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 02:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427092027.1598740-3-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427092027.1598740-1-xin@zytor.com>
For some reason, there are some TSC-related functions in the MSR
header even though there is a tsc.h header.
Relocate rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h> to <asm/tsc.h>, and
subsequently remove the inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>.
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
Change in v4:
*) Add missing includes in a different patch (Ilpo Järvinen).
Change in v3:
* Add a problem statement to the changelog (Dave Hansen).
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 54 ---------------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 72a9ebc99078..2caa13830e11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -170,60 +170,6 @@ native_write_msr_safe(u32 msr, u32 low, u32 high)
extern int rdmsr_safe_regs(u32 regs[8]);
extern int wrmsr_safe_regs(u32 regs[8]);
-/**
- * rdtsc() - returns the current TSC without ordering constraints
- *
- * rdtsc() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer. The
- * only ordering constraint it supplies is the ordering implied by
- * "asm volatile": it will put the RDTSC in the place you expect. The
- * CPU can and will speculatively execute that RDTSC, though, so the
- * results can be non-monotonic if compared on different CPUs.
- */
-static __always_inline u64 rdtsc(void)
-{
- DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
-
- asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
-
- return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
-}
-
-/**
- * rdtsc_ordered() - read the current TSC in program order
- *
- * rdtsc_ordered() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.
- * It is ordered like a load to a global in-memory counter. It should
- * be impossible to observe non-monotonic rdtsc_unordered() behavior
- * across multiple CPUs as long as the TSC is synced.
- */
-static __always_inline u64 rdtsc_ordered(void)
-{
- DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
-
- /*
- * The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
- * access. The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
- * point, but empirically an RDTSC instruction can be
- * speculatively executed before prior loads. An RDTSC
- * immediately after an appropriate barrier appears to be
- * ordered as a normal load, that is, it provides the same
- * ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
- * that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
- * time stamp.
- *
- * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
- * RDTSCP as the default.
- */
- asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2("rdtsc",
- "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
- "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
- : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
- /* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
- :: "ecx");
-
- return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
-}
-
static inline u64 native_read_pmc(int counter)
{
DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
index 94408a784c8e..13335a130edf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -7,7 +7,81 @@
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+/*
+ * both i386 and x86_64 returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, but gcc's "A"
+ * constraint has different meanings. For i386, "A" means exactly
+ * edx:eax, while for x86_64 it doesn't mean rdx:rax or edx:eax. Instead,
+ * it means rax *or* rdx.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+/* Using 64-bit values saves one instruction clearing the high half of low */
+#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) unsigned long low, high
+#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high) ((low) | (high) << 32)
+#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high) "=a" (low), "=d" (high)
+#else
+#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) u64 val
+#define EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high) (val)
+#define EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high) "=A" (val)
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * rdtsc() - returns the current TSC without ordering constraints
+ *
+ * rdtsc() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer. The
+ * only ordering constraint it supplies is the ordering implied by
+ * "asm volatile": it will put the RDTSC in the place you expect. The
+ * CPU can and will speculatively execute that RDTSC, though, so the
+ * results can be non-monotonic if compared on different CPUs.
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 rdtsc(void)
+{
+ DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
+ asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
+
+ return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
+}
+
+/**
+ * rdtsc_ordered() - read the current TSC in program order
+ *
+ * rdtsc_ordered() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer.
+ * It is ordered like a load to a global in-memory counter. It should
+ * be impossible to observe non-monotonic rdtsc_unordered() behavior
+ * across multiple CPUs as long as the TSC is synced.
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 rdtsc_ordered(void)
+{
+ DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
+ /*
+ * The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
+ * access. The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
+ * point, but empirically an RDTSC instruction can be
+ * speculatively executed before prior loads. An RDTSC
+ * immediately after an appropriate barrier appears to be
+ * ordered as a normal load, that is, it provides the same
+ * ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
+ * that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
+ * time stamp.
+ *
+ * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
+ * RDTSCP as the default.
+ */
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2("rdtsc",
+ "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
+ "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
+ : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
+ /* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
+ :: "ecx");
+
+ return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
+}
+
+#undef DECLARE_ARGS
+#undef EAX_EDX_VAL
+#undef EAX_EDX_RET
/*
* Standard way to access the cycle counter.
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-27 9:20 [PATCH v4 00/15] MSR code cleanup part one Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] x86/msr: Add missing includes of <asm/msr.h> Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-29 9:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-29 17:27 ` Xin Li
2025-04-30 4:20 ` Michael Kelley
2025-04-30 9:12 ` Xin Li
2025-04-30 8:41 ` Xin Li
2025-04-30 9:17 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-30 17:34 ` Xin Li
2025-05-01 5:42 ` [PATCH v4A " Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02 13:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-02 17:50 ` Xin Li
2025-04-27 9:20 ` Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2025-05-02 8:02 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to <asm/tsc.h> Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:09 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:01 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02 18:00 ` Xin Li
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] x86/msr: Remove rdpmc() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] x86/msr: Rename rdpmcl() to rdpmc() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] x86/msr: Convert the rdpmc() macro into an always inline function Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] x86/xen/msr: Return u64 consistently in Xen PMC read functions Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] x86/msr: Convert __wrmsr() uses to native_wrmsr{,q}() uses Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] x86/msr: Add the native_rdmsrq() helper Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] x86/msr: Convert __rdmsr() uses to native_rdmsrq() uses Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove calling native_{read,write}_msr{,_safe}() in pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] x86/xen/msr: Remove the error pointer argument from set_seg() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] x86/pvops/msr: refactor pv_cpu_ops.write_msr{,_safe}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] x86/msr: Replace wrmsr(msr, low, 0) with wrmsrq(msr, low) Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] x86/msr: Change the function type of native_read_msr_safe() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-02 14:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] MSR code cleanup part one Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250427092027.1598740-3-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox