From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907D726B951; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 23:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757115850; cv=none; b=iXMjt0/mrpaCW5OPRj/diRxqY80RBODvxklsAtfByDOdHhtcygdXBA25j87yzMTuwdkGPAkpqUnCIOuimS3/579wrA8NM/1JDa37qvRHp+0N24CiaGxnyRB/zi66DLcQVA1xqldf3a6Wqlzzw15fHa6H/5zXrEQLKQeFZDZpTSs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757115850; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JB2AWdpd6oOew6X8rFejlh9xwJ6u6nBOdsCOLNmJ+Gs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kTreQKwFUiT5CxETW05sLYSlMyKa8au3tNlJodZ3vMha6AH5Zr1TEdbRW3/J8Jvf7rnx12UGgLSsqmNK8BaDUOG+PouI0w1YD3eOX2hBLBysSLx8zYrGulQaS4oAaoumYxM91Ad8Y1NavvTuq4ALE5rXUb/mMcVz5Bl8dDdgtmg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QCOGK2Hg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QCOGK2Hg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DF88C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 23:44:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757115850; bh=JB2AWdpd6oOew6X8rFejlh9xwJ6u6nBOdsCOLNmJ+Gs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QCOGK2HggWyHfRNIMvAHSZBel8NA3s+j0wOWpxTqBvFsBRu/HRYygjTRaAUDQnDsS jHFBu/uae10GAq1xKndbHoepRwGgtRi24hQ+O+gPMyJzCI4HNqdCztp613XF36F/Sb bCt/7HeC492vUtWTNlKeC+3Bs1kx/Mfk4sNlpOII2/9kwcTTVqAMjK4jvF90LH2bKa hdmIw1m0M/9rAYWoZyD0xsJgAQmPLRFCirHH5YFt9t7pxYb9PQWG1DSJm1BdtbQwt4 3jTnBviihlco3zAdb6f6I5d1WR1sNUczi4OjegOu/8drZZtTmSWTWi5X/HeUJIv6Bk 8JahsVS1pRAbg== Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:44:08 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Breno Leitao Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?UTF-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, jdamato@fastly.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/7] net: ethtool: add get_rxrings callback to optimize RX ring queries Message-ID: <20250905164408.5a87a0f8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250905164253.4e9902d2@kernel.org> References: <20250905-gxrings-v1-0-984fc471f28f@debian.org> <20250905-gxrings-v1-4-984fc471f28f@debian.org> <20250905164253.4e9902d2@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:42:53 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:07:23 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > > + int (*get_rxrings)(struct net_device *dev); > > I think this can return u32.. Two more things, actually - get_rx_ring_count would sound a little bit more in line with the get_rxfh_*_size helpers. And let's put it somewhere closer to the rxfh callbacks. It's actually mostly used by RXFH AKA RSS code.