From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Maxime Coquelin" <mcoqueli@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Yongji Xie" <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Dragos Tatulea DE" <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] virtio_net: timeout control virtqueue commands
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 02:07:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015020717-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsqD1qAgt8qfV=fwj1OeBeXzoOF1wXdqzJaWYR2A=C+UA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:44:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 6:21 PM Maxime Coquelin <mcoqueli@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:25 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:14:40AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 10:29 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > > > > An userland device implemented through VDUSE could take rtnl forever if
> > > > > > the virtio-net driver is running on top of virtio_vdpa. Let's break the
> > > > > > device if it does not return the buffer in a longer-than-assumible
> > > > > > timeout.
> > > > >
> > > > > So now I can't debug qemu with gdb because guest dies :(
> > > > > Let's not break valid use-cases please.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead, solve it in vduse, probably by handling cvq within
> > > > > kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Would a shadow control virtqueue implementation in the VDUSE driver work?
> > > > It would ack systematically messages sent by the Virtio-net driver,
> > > > and so assume the userspace application will Ack them.
> > > >
> > > > When the userspace application handles the message, if the handling fails,
> > > > it somehow marks the device as broken?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Maxime
> > >
> > > Yes but it's a bit more convoluted than just acking them.
> > > Once you use the buffer you can get another one and so on
> > > with no limit.
> > > One fix is to actually maintain device state in the
> > > kernel, update it, and then notify userspace.
> >
> > I agree, this is the way to go.
> >
> > Thanks for your insights,
> > Maxime
>
> A timeout still needs to be considered in this case. Or I may miss something?
>
> Thanks
Not as such, kernel can use buffers (semi) predictably.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > A less agressive path can be taken to recover the device, like only
> > > > > > resetting the control virtqueue. However, the state of the device after
> > > > > > this action is taken races, as the vq could be reset after the device
> > > > > > writes the OK. Leaving TODO anyway.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > index 31bd32bdecaf..ed68ad69a019 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > @@ -3576,6 +3576,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat;
> > > > > > u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0;
> > > > > > + unsigned long end_time;
> > > > > > bool ok;
> > > > > > int ret;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -3614,11 +3615,20 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping
> > > > > > * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Long timeout so a malicious device is not able to lock rtnl forever.
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > + end_time = jiffies + 30 * HZ;
> > > > > > while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
> > > > > > !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
> > > > > > cond_resched();
> > > > > > cpu_relax();
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (time_after(end_time, jiffies)) {
> > > > > > + /* TODO Reset vq if possible? */
> > > > > > + virtio_break_device(vi->vdev);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > unlock:
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.51.0
> > > > >
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 13:06 [RFC 0/2] Lift restriction about VDUSE net devices with CVQ Eugenio Pérez
2025-10-07 13:06 ` [RFC 1/2] virtio_net: timeout control virtqueue commands Eugenio Pérez
2025-10-11 7:44 ` Jason Wang
2025-10-14 7:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-14 8:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-14 9:14 ` Maxime Coquelin
2025-10-14 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-14 10:21 ` Maxime Coquelin
2025-10-15 4:44 ` Jason Wang
2025-10-15 6:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-10-15 6:08 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-15 6:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-15 6:52 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-15 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-15 7:45 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-15 8:03 ` Maxime Coquelin
2025-10-15 8:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-15 9:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2025-10-15 10:36 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-16 5:39 ` Jason Wang
2025-10-16 5:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-16 6:03 ` Jason Wang
2025-10-16 6:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-16 6:25 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-17 6:36 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-17 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-17 7:21 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-22 9:46 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-22 10:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-22 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-22 10:50 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-22 11:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-22 12:55 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-28 14:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-28 14:37 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-28 14:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-28 14:57 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-29 0:36 ` Jason Wang
2025-11-05 9:02 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-11-09 21:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-07 13:06 ` [RFC 2/2] vduse: lift restriction about net devices with CVQ Eugenio Pérez
2025-10-09 13:14 ` Maxime Coquelin
2025-10-15 6:11 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-10-14 8:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-10-15 6:25 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015020717-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcoqueli@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).