From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] powerpc/smp: Assume preempt if CPU is inactive.
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 23:24:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251204175405.1511340-15-srikar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251204175405.1511340-1-srikar@linux.ibm.com>
When a vCPU is marked inactive, it qualifies as preempted vCPU.
And when a vCPU is marked active, we should hope that its not going to
be preempted. Also with lower steal times, the chances of active vCPU
being preempted reduces too.
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 62 +++++------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
index b78b82d66057..93c4e4f57cb3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
if (!is_shared_processor())
return false;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
+ /*
+ * Assume the target CPU to be preempted if it is above soft
+ * entitlement limit
+ */
+ if (!is_kvm_guest())
+ return !cpu_active(cpu);
+#endif
+
/*
* If the hypervisor has dispatched the target CPU on a physical
* processor, then the target CPU is definitely not preempted.
@@ -159,59 +168,6 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
if (!is_vcpu_idle(cpu))
return true;
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
- if (!is_kvm_guest()) {
- int first_cpu, i;
-
- /*
- * The result of vcpu_is_preempted() is used in a
- * speculative way, and is always subject to invalidation
- * by events internal and external to Linux. While we can
- * be called in preemptable context (in the Linux sense),
- * we're not accessing per-cpu resources in a way that can
- * race destructively with Linux scheduler preemption and
- * migration, and callers can tolerate the potential for
- * error introduced by sampling the CPU index without
- * pinning the task to it. So it is permissible to use
- * raw_smp_processor_id() here to defeat the preempt debug
- * warnings that can arise from using smp_processor_id()
- * in arbitrary contexts.
- */
- first_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(raw_smp_processor_id());
-
- /*
- * The PowerVM hypervisor dispatches VMs on a whole core
- * basis. So we know that a thread sibling of the executing CPU
- * cannot have been preempted by the hypervisor, even if it
- * has called H_CONFER, which will set the yield bit.
- */
- if (cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu) == first_cpu)
- return false;
-
- /*
- * The specific target CPU was marked by guest OS as idle, but
- * then also check all other cpus in the core for PowerVM
- * because it does core scheduling and one of the vcpu
- * of the core getting preempted by hypervisor implies
- * other vcpus can also be considered preempted.
- */
- first_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
- for (i = first_cpu; i < first_cpu + threads_per_core; i++) {
- if (i == cpu)
- continue;
- if (vcpu_is_dispatched(i))
- return false;
- if (!is_vcpu_idle(i))
- return true;
- }
- }
-#endif
-
- /*
- * None of the threads in target CPU's core are running but none of
- * them were preempted too. Hence assume the target CPU to be
- * non-preempted.
- */
return false;
}
--
2.43.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-04 17:53 [PATCH 00/17] Steal time based dynamic CPU resource management Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 01/17] sched/fair: Enable group_asym_packing in find_idlest_group Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 02/17] powerpc/lpar: Reorder steal accounting calculation Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 03/17] pseries/lpar: Process steal metrics Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 04/17] powerpc/smp: Add num_available_cores callback for smp_ops Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 05/17] pseries/smp: Query and set entitlements Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 06/17] powerpc/smp: Delay processing steal time at boot Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 07/17] sched/core: Set balance_callback only if CPU is dying Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 08/17] sched/core: Implement CPU soft offline/online Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-05 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-05 18:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-05 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-05 18:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 09/17] powerpc/smp: Implement arch_scale_cpu_capacity for shared LPARs Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 10/17] powerpc/smp: Define arch_update_cpu_topology " Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 11/17] pseries/smp: Create soft offline infrastructure for Powerpc " Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 12/17] pseries/smp: Trigger softoffline based on steal metrics Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 13/17] pseries/smp: Account cores when triggering softoffline Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 15/17] pseries/hotplug: Update available_cores on a dlpar event Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 16/17] pseries/smp: Allow users to override steal thresholds Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 17/17] pseries/lpar: Add debug interface to set steal interval Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251204175405.1511340-15-srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).