virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] powerpc/smp: Assume preempt if CPU is inactive.
Date: Thu,  4 Dec 2025 23:24:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251204175405.1511340-15-srikar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251204175405.1511340-1-srikar@linux.ibm.com>

When a vCPU is marked inactive, it qualifies as preempted vCPU.
And when a vCPU is marked active, we should hope that its not going to
be preempted. Also with lower steal times, the chances of active vCPU
being preempted reduces too.

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 62 +++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
index b78b82d66057..93c4e4f57cb3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
 	if (!is_shared_processor())
 		return false;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
+	/*
+	 * Assume the target CPU to be preempted if it is above soft
+	 * entitlement limit
+	 */
+	if (!is_kvm_guest())
+		return !cpu_active(cpu);
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * If the hypervisor has dispatched the target CPU on a physical
 	 * processor, then the target CPU is definitely not preempted.
@@ -159,59 +168,6 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
 	if (!is_vcpu_idle(cpu))
 		return true;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
-	if (!is_kvm_guest()) {
-		int first_cpu, i;
-
-		/*
-		 * The result of vcpu_is_preempted() is used in a
-		 * speculative way, and is always subject to invalidation
-		 * by events internal and external to Linux. While we can
-		 * be called in preemptable context (in the Linux sense),
-		 * we're not accessing per-cpu resources in a way that can
-		 * race destructively with Linux scheduler preemption and
-		 * migration, and callers can tolerate the potential for
-		 * error introduced by sampling the CPU index without
-		 * pinning the task to it. So it is permissible to use
-		 * raw_smp_processor_id() here to defeat the preempt debug
-		 * warnings that can arise from using smp_processor_id()
-		 * in arbitrary contexts.
-		 */
-		first_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(raw_smp_processor_id());
-
-		/*
-		 * The PowerVM hypervisor dispatches VMs on a whole core
-		 * basis. So we know that a thread sibling of the executing CPU
-		 * cannot have been preempted by the hypervisor, even if it
-		 * has called H_CONFER, which will set the yield bit.
-		 */
-		if (cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu) == first_cpu)
-			return false;
-
-		/*
-		 * The specific target CPU was marked by guest OS as idle, but
-		 * then also check all other cpus in the core for PowerVM
-		 * because it does core scheduling and one of the vcpu
-		 * of the core getting preempted by hypervisor implies
-		 * other vcpus can also be considered preempted.
-		 */
-		first_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
-		for (i = first_cpu; i < first_cpu + threads_per_core; i++) {
-			if (i == cpu)
-				continue;
-			if (vcpu_is_dispatched(i))
-				return false;
-			if (!is_vcpu_idle(i))
-				return true;
-		}
-	}
-#endif
-
-	/*
-	 * None of the threads in target CPU's core are running but none of
-	 * them were preempted too. Hence assume the target CPU to be
-	 * non-preempted.
-	 */
 	return false;
 }
 
-- 
2.43.7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-04 17:53 [PATCH 00/17] Steal time based dynamic CPU resource management Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 01/17] sched/fair: Enable group_asym_packing in find_idlest_group Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 02/17] powerpc/lpar: Reorder steal accounting calculation Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 03/17] pseries/lpar: Process steal metrics Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 04/17] powerpc/smp: Add num_available_cores callback for smp_ops Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 05/17] pseries/smp: Query and set entitlements Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 06/17] powerpc/smp: Delay processing steal time at boot Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 07/17] sched/core: Set balance_callback only if CPU is dying Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 08/17] sched/core: Implement CPU soft offline/online Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-05 16:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-05 18:54     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-05 16:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-05 18:57     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 09/17] powerpc/smp: Implement arch_scale_cpu_capacity for shared LPARs Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 10/17] powerpc/smp: Define arch_update_cpu_topology " Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 11/17] pseries/smp: Create soft offline infrastructure for Powerpc " Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 12/17] pseries/smp: Trigger softoffline based on steal metrics Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 13/17] pseries/smp: Account cores when triggering softoffline Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 15/17] pseries/hotplug: Update available_cores on a dlpar event Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 16/17] pseries/smp: Allow users to override steal thresholds Srikar Dronamraju
2025-12-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 17/17] pseries/lpar: Add debug interface to set steal interval Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251204175405.1511340-15-srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).