From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E3625F98B; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 06:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768287440; cv=none; b=NEyiNWhlAWiO4ff5D4DBFt7vgxAhAr2ba9/lmsVdVyODom92YHbRybC2ydzPqbBIDf1jkm1LytrcDJEjib1W+dXrJPt0TULTacmkWo1NBR2PDZM2RBUc7oHVRILFur+GjMKLWSG42+ktXgm2Zy+/NskhRaqi6Wkr01CCWICajSM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768287440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=60SPyWB8vDd2rUgvHslTdiPd0EofSPJHlT4QUyPma6A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E+rAHihzGr0aZNgA0sy+gf/Jy3AJQJ8qq8zQApmyH6FD+Se6npwgH6uhqIxI3gdLSeu/ovZUPErZLWJwZFcLqS+xmxu8AkLf8aXXcj3bJCvnHci/koUtYNMWyyRbOJJIoqkVL/iP0FpcXAvZfmAK3SaqWkvY6ruV+pG4OFpqGwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R1NApMXh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R1NApMXh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5D12C116C6; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 06:57:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768287440; bh=60SPyWB8vDd2rUgvHslTdiPd0EofSPJHlT4QUyPma6A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R1NApMXhnqwRdTk2bbAImX9NrjtIDbtzQx9IWe8no+TStcOX4nHWBNhBtEh+GTKfh 5D2bVETHk3k4qJ3TfhxNbgsDzI/0L7N9K5AjJ5ICcWGg61rv3Y+R7jL66oh0Suq20c 8ibdQVDTHWMXjBYyAHqG+dWbXUn3ynN5ePye7vIIG+VWbvicoe4q/j99LOhZgBjKP2 urczlgGE8vb5kkt9cvhYHL4DJkbBf/GmURlHuhpD78NJaytElj/4UwAT5yTfTkSnZY EQclNoU14InQbSaOyIdaYIGps5fgK3GMHmyi1TJsMHNXkh66lxmk3y2lLgljPPwTfN Lb2RJ8DPFS6dg== Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 06:57:18 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Juergen Gross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Long Li , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ajay Kaher , Alexey Makhalov , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Boris Ostrovsky , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header Message-ID: <20260113065718.GD3099059@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2.local> References: <20260105110520.21356-1-jgross@suse.com> <20260105110520.21356-22-jgross@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260105110520.21356-22-jgross@suse.com> On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 12:05:20PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > Instead of having the pv spinlock function definitions in paravirt.h, > move them into the new header paravirt-spinlock.h. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross > --- > V2: > - use new header instead of qspinlock.h > - use dedicated pv_ops_lock array > - move more paravirt related lock code > V3: > - hide native_pv_lock_init() with CONFIG_SMP (kernel test robot) > V4: > - don't reference pv_ops_lock without CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > (kernel test robot) > V5: > - move paravirt_set_cap() declaration into paravirt-base.h > (kernel test robot) > --- > arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c | 10 +- Acked-by: Wei Liu (Microsoft)