From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Petr Tesarik" <ptesarik@suse.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dma-direct: prevent SWIOTLB path when DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT is set
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:47:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312164747.GA12611@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312122058.GE1469476@ziepe.ca>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 09:20:58AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT indicates that SWIOTLB must not be used.
> > Ensure the SWIOTLB path is declined whenever the DMA direct path is
> > selected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/dma/direct.h | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
> > index e89f175e9c2d0..6184ff303f080 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
> > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
> > dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> >
> > if (is_swiotlb_force_bounce(dev)) {
> > - if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO)
> > + if (attrs & (DMA_ATTR_MMIO | DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT))
> > return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> >
> > return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
>
> Oh here it is, still maybe it is better to put it in swiotlb_map() ?
It is better do not call function which is not going to work. We have
same flow for DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT and DMA_ATTR_MMIO, which both
don't work with SWIOTLB.
Thanks
>
> Jason
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 19:08 [PATCH v2 0/8] RDMA: Enable operation with DMA debug enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dma-debug: Allow multiple invocations of overlapping entries Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dma-mapping: handle DMA_ATTR_CPU_CACHE_CLEAN in trace output Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dma-mapping: Clarify valid conditions for CPU cache line overlap Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] dma-mapping: Introduce DMA require coherency attribute Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-12 12:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 16:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] dma-direct: prevent SWIOTLB path when DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT is set Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-12 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 16:47 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/dma: add support for DMA_ATTR_REQUIRE_COHERENT attribute Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] RDMA/umem: Tell DMA mapping that UMEM requires coherency Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-12 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/hmm: Indicate that HMM requires DMA coherency Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-12 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 16:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260312164747.GA12611@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox