From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
willemb@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, lijing@hygon.cn,
yingzhiwei@hygon.cn, Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:04:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317113433.927022-1-zhud@hygon.cn>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 07:34:33PM +0800, Di Zhu wrote:
> Negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS indicates the device
> allows control over offload support, but the offloads that can be
> controlled may have nothing to do with GRO (e.g., if neither GUEST_TSO4
> nor GUEST_TSO6 is supported).
>
> In such a setup, reporting NETIF_F_GRO_HW as available for the device
> is too optimistic and misleading to the user.
>
> Improve the situation by masking off NETIF_F_GRO_HW unless the device
> possesses actual GRO-related offload capabilities. Out of an abundance
> of caution, this does not change the current behaviour for hardware with
> just v6 or just v4 GRO: current interfaces do not allow distinguishing
> between v6/v4 GRO, so we can't expose them to userspace precisely.
>
> Fixes: dbcf24d15388 ("virtio-net: use NETIF_F_GRO_HW instead of NETIF_F_LRO")
> Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
> ---
> /* v3 */
> -Update Fixes tag to dbcf24d15388
> -Refine commit message using Maintainer's "too optimistic"
> phrasing to clarify the risk of misleading configurations.
>
> /* v2 */
> -make the modified logic clearer
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 72d6a9c6a5a2..b233c99925e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6781,8 +6781,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
> dev->features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> - if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
> - dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
>
> dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
> dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> @@ -7058,6 +7056,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
>
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) &&
> + (vi->guest_offloads_capable & GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK))
> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> +
Hmm wait a second. Isn't this late? netdev registered, even link is
up already.
Documentation/networking/netdev-features.rst says:
1. netdev->hw_features set contains features whose state may possibly
be changed (enabled or disabled) for a particular device by user's
request. This set should be initialized in ndo_init callback and not
changed later.
I'd say let's move it up?
Having said that, we already have a bug:
dev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_RXHASH;
is after register, too.
This is because we take pains to recover from these commands failing.
Except, we completely ignore that in virtnet_set_rxfh ...
Cc relevant contributors to maybe take a look at fixing all that.
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> err = virtnet_cpu_notif_add(vi);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 11:34 [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported Di Zhu
2026-03-17 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-03-17 12:41 ` Zhud
2026-03-17 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 0:43 ` Zhud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lijing@hygon.cn \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yingzhiwei@hygon.cn \
--cc=zhud@hygon.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox