public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	willemb@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, lijing@hygon.cn,
	yingzhiwei@hygon.cn, Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:04:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317113433.927022-1-zhud@hygon.cn>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 07:34:33PM +0800, Di Zhu wrote:
> Negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS indicates the device
> allows control over offload support, but the offloads that can be
> controlled may have nothing to do with GRO (e.g., if neither GUEST_TSO4
> nor GUEST_TSO6 is supported).
> 
> In such a setup, reporting NETIF_F_GRO_HW as available for the device
> is too optimistic and misleading to the user.
> 
> Improve the situation by masking off NETIF_F_GRO_HW unless the device
> possesses actual GRO-related offload capabilities. Out of an abundance
> of caution, this does not change the current behaviour for hardware with
> just v6 or just v4 GRO: current interfaces do not allow distinguishing
> between v6/v4 GRO, so we can't expose them to userspace precisely.
> 
> Fixes: dbcf24d15388 ("virtio-net: use NETIF_F_GRO_HW instead of NETIF_F_LRO")
> Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
> ---
> /* v3 */
>   -Update Fixes tag to dbcf24d15388
>   -Refine commit message using Maintainer's "too optimistic" 
>     phrasing to clarify the risk of misleading configurations.
> 
> /* v2 */
>   -make the modified logic clearer
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 72d6a9c6a5a2..b233c99925e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6781,8 +6781,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
>  	    virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
>  		dev->features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> -	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
> -		dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
>  
>  	dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
>  	dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> @@ -7058,6 +7056,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	}
>  	vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
>  
> +	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) &&
> +	    (vi->guest_offloads_capable & GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK))
> +		dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> +

Hmm wait a second. Isn't this late? netdev registered, even link is
up already.

Documentation/networking/netdev-features.rst says:

 1. netdev->hw_features set contains features whose state may possibly
    be changed (enabled or disabled) for a particular device by user's
    request.  This set should be initialized in ndo_init callback and not
    changed later.



I'd say let's move it up?





Having said that, we already have a bug:

  dev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_RXHASH;                                                                                                   
is after register, too.

This is because we take pains to recover from these commands failing.
Except, we completely ignore that in virtnet_set_rxfh ...


Cc relevant contributors to maybe take a look at fixing all that.



>  	rtnl_unlock();
>  
>  	err = virtnet_cpu_notif_add(vi);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 11:34 [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported Di Zhu
2026-03-17 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-03-17 12:41   ` Zhud
2026-03-17 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19  0:43   ` Zhud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lijing@hygon.cn \
    --cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yingzhiwei@hygon.cn \
    --cc=zhud@hygon.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox