From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376A43D88FE for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774342413; cv=none; b=V2SlfMVO+t9oE4H9U06qKU3SfkQliOzwHlzTetxk6dzaB0DnpJLaDVcdJLdBXYPwVkHGO5sYJ1JrjpCC443mlTezA/4GmF30oU/nyOgjlTl9iNSHTBIIL4g+uNdJ+mw1KLiK7tt0ExwAaFJf0Z28R+cm386ZUKWbZQywDOAFv5k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774342413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B80OrE2TyDwgJ0jOPDUtK8dp4/gddcy+8J6bsgw0WhI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=twjKw9oFMiMPUsbJeT7PE/h4B6JnoRUDAghTihKnHZLWKLEtD8AS4e6dZQxvDBx32OZ1wULU+L+FTlcn0TUuk0Mnc+BuxyXTEdpDvqgcgLTjJgFKxgf5+jWBQLYz4SApLiVLTYAUjTePqrmgn3+ujf+6T69ma4jerODefAbcLGk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=bfZiOVLP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="bfZiOVLP" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1774342410; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r4i42uUk09a42HzxE9DZCh9MNHfSJlOmtFh/Ez0FeKo=; b=bfZiOVLPMKSauHlnb2CihyiJSRqCLYaNHoEysG29XcsVxPVbt/L8QA8FsXXbEMXk50FCPn SPiaiSVXikhWgg+RF2PDxDOwAuJ2y1Mphr2eC1iPeU7k/byHcFHNdnGThc3ZJolikPLt0O Q/Utvb4y7tulwQbjhKpwXUn1WcdoSEE= From: Lance Yang To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, david@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ypodemsk@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, shy828301@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, jgross@suse.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, Lance Yang Subject: [PATCH v8 1/2] mm/mmu_gather: prepare to skip redundant sync IPIs Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:52:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20260324085238.44477-2-lance.yang@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20260324085238.44477-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> References: <20260324085238.44477-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Lance Yang When page table operations require synchronization with software/lockless walkers, they call tlb_remove_table_sync_{one,rcu}() after flushing the TLB (tlb->freed_tables or tlb->unshared_tables). On architectures where the TLB flush already sends IPIs to all target CPUs, the subsequent sync IPI broadcast is redundant. This is not only costly on large systems where it disrupts all CPUs even for single-process page table operations, but has also been reported to hurt RT workloads[1]. Introduce tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() to check if the prior TLB flush already provided the necessary synchronization. When true, the sync calls can early-return. A few cases rely on this synchronization: 1) hugetlb PMD unshare[2]: The problem is not the freeing but the reuse of the PMD table for other purposes in the last remaining user after unsharing. 2) khugepaged collapse[3]: Ensure no concurrent GUP-fast before collapsing and (possibly) freeing the page table / re-depositing it. Currently always returns false (no behavior change). The follow-up patch will enable the optimization for x86. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1b27a3fa-359a-43d0-bdeb-c31341749367@kernel.org/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/6a364356-5fea-4a6c-b959-ba3b22ce9c88@kernel.org/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/2cb4503d-3a3f-4f6c-8038-7b3d1c74b3c2@kernel.org/ Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Signed-off-by: Lance Yang --- include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ mm/mmu_gather.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h index bdcc2778ac64..cb41cc6a0024 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h @@ -240,6 +240,23 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table) } #endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE */ +/** + * tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast - does TLB flush imply IPI sync + * + * When page table operations require synchronization with software/lockless + * walkers, they flush the TLB (tlb->freed_tables or tlb->unshared_tables) + * then call tlb_remove_table_sync_{one,rcu}(). If the flush already sent + * IPIs to all CPUs, the sync call is redundant. + * + * Returns false by default. Architectures can override by defining this. + */ +#ifndef tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE /* * This allows an architecture that does not use the linux page-tables for diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c index 3985d856de7f..37a6a711c37e 100644 --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c @@ -283,6 +283,14 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void) * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers that rely on * IRQ disabling. */ + + /* + * Skip IPI if the preceding TLB flush already synchronized with + * all CPUs that could be doing software/lockless page table walks. + */ + if (tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast()) + return; + smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1); } @@ -312,6 +320,13 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch) */ void tlb_remove_table_sync_rcu(void) { + /* + * Skip RCU wait if the preceding TLB flush already synchronized + * with all CPUs that could be doing software/lockless page table walks. + */ + if (tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast()) + return; + synchronize_rcu(); } -- 2.49.0