From: Raf Dickson <rafdog35@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
bryan-bt.tan@broadcom.com, vishnu.dasa@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Raf Dickson <rafdog35@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] vsock: fold sk_acceptq_removed() into vsock_remove_pending()
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:11:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610091121.213324-3-rafdog35@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610091121.213324-1-rafdog35@gmail.com>
Callers of vsock_remove_pending() must also call sk_acceptq_removed()
to keep sk_ack_backlog consistent. Move the call into
vsock_remove_pending() itself to make it automatic and prevent future
callers from forgetting it.
Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raf Dickson <rafdog35@gmail.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 3 +--
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 73e6416ee9..b9772a0205 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ void vsock_remove_pending(struct sock *listener, struct sock *pending)
list_del_init(&vpending->pending_links);
sock_put(listener);
sock_put(pending);
+ sk_acceptq_removed(listener);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_remove_pending);
@@ -761,8 +762,6 @@ static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (vsock_is_pending(sk)) {
vsock_remove_pending(listener, sk);
-
- sk_acceptq_removed(listener);
} else if (!vsk->rejected) {
/* We are not on the pending list and accept() did not reject
* us, so we must have been accepted by our user process. We
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
index 4ce6660c11..356bebca7c 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
@@ -980,11 +980,8 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk,
err = -EINVAL;
}
- if (err < 0) {
+ if (err < 0)
vsock_remove_pending(sk, pending);
- sk_acceptq_removed(sk);
- }
-
release_sock(pending);
vmci_transport_release_pending(pending);
--
2.54.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 9:11 [PATCH net-next 0/2] vsock: fold acceptq accounting into core helpers Raf Dickson
2026-06-10 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] vsock: fold sk_acceptq_added() into vsock_enqueue_accept() Raf Dickson
2026-06-10 9:11 ` Raf Dickson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610091121.213324-3-rafdog35@gmail.com \
--to=rafdog35@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bryan-bt.tan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishnu.dasa@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox