From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>, Andy King <acking@vmware.com>,
George Zhang <georgezhang@vmware.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Subject: [PATCH net] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 23:58:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v1-1-50298b9ccfbf@rbox.co> (raw)
Ensure connect() resets the socket only if it has never been established.
Handle the previously overlooked TCP_ESTABLISHED -> TCP_CLOSING
transition (on VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST), which could race with the connect
loop.
Resetting a socket that is still present in connected_table can lead to
memory corruption. The reporter noted lost transports for in-flight skbs,
and I have reproduced crashes caused by re-insertion into connected_table.
list_add double add: new=, prev=, next=.
kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:35!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x11f/0x130
Call Trace:
vsock_insert_connected.cold+0xe/0x13
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x10e9/0x1460
vsock_loopback_work+0x305/0x480
process_one_work+0xe4c/0x1560
worker_thread+0x4f1/0xd60
kthread+0x36e/0x470
ret_from_fork+0x47b/0x6b0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Drop the inaccurate comment above signal_pending(). This fix is
supplementary to commit 002541ef650b ("vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on
connect() if already established"). Details at Link.
Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Reported-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/anzT1fREOSyHT99k@v4bel/
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
---
Note that this is not a complete fix. connect()'s schedule_timeout() can
still race with two other functions that set sk_state = TCP_CLOSE while
keeping the socket in connected_table:
1. vmci_transport_handle_detach(): no way for me to test,
2. virtio_vsock_reset_sock(): tested by unbinding the driver
(/sys/bus/virtio/drivers/virtio_transport/unbind).
The latter appears easy to fix by adding __vsock_remove_connected() and
switching to a _safe iterator in vsock_for_each_connected_socket().
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index f840498b58af..eec5dd6daebb 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1834,23 +1834,20 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
lock_sock(sk);
- /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
- * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
+ /* Connection was established. Whatever happens to socket once
+ * we release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
* into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
*
* Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
* here is racy and insecure.
*/
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
+ sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING)
break;
/* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
* to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
* to retry.
- *
- * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
- * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
- * assigned.
*/
if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
@@ -1875,7 +1872,8 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
}
err = sock_error(sk);
- if (err) {
+ if (err &&
+ sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED && sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSING) {
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
}
---
base-commit: 9a1599eeb8d18a2113e4cabcbd3bec5a8377dbed
change-id: 20260820-vsock-connect-reset-closing-98dd28769d7f
Best regards,
--
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 21:58 Michal Luczaj [this message]
2026-09-09 22:44 ` [PATCH net] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket Bobby Eshleman
2026-09-10 20:51 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-10 21:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v1-1-50298b9ccfbf@rbox.co \
--to=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=acking@vmware.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtor@vmware.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=georgezhang@vmware.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox