From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio_pci_modern: move avq cleanup from reset to del_vqs
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:51:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912105115.C40D21F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21fe35ad7b66e2c30dbdba6fe4df4824d1c0db66.1789204858.git.mst@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Surprise removal of the PF device while a VF is executing an admin command leads to an unresolvable deadlock.
--
commit 77107fdcf13b9589fc326075af29c2e63cc3478d
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio_pci_modern: move avq cleanup from reset to del_vqs
This commit moves the admin virtqueue cleanup from the device reset path
to the virtqueue deletion path to prevent a race condition with the interrupt
handler.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260911125745.E0A2F1F00899@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> index 6d8ae2a6a8caf..b4249afd7f580 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -364,6 +364,12 @@ static void vp_modern_avq_cleanup(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> }
>
> +static void vp_modern_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + vp_modern_avq_cleanup(vdev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this architecture still
lead to an unresolvable deadlock during a surprise removal of the PF device?
If a VF driver executes an admin command, the thread blocks uninterruptibly
in virtqueue_exec_admin_cmd() waiting for the command to complete.
If a surprise removal of the PF occurs while the VF is blocked, the PF
driver calls virtio_pci_remove(), which then calls pci_disable_sriov() to
wait for all VFs to unbind.
However, the VF unbind is blocked because the VF thread is stuck in
wait_for_completion(). Because pci_disable_sriov() never returns, the PF
removal never reaches unregister_virtio_device() and thus never calls this
vp_modern_del_vqs() function to detach the unused buffers and unblock the
VF thread.
Is there a way to abort the pending admin commands earlier in the PF surprise
removal path, before it blocks on disabling SRIOV?
> + vp_del_vqs(vdev);
> +}
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789204858.git.mst@redhat.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 10:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio: fix callback synchronization and avq cleanup on reset Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] virtio: synchronize callbacks after device reset Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-12 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio_pci_modern: move avq cleanup from reset to del_vqs Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-12 10:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio_pci: drop callback sync on reset Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-12 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260912105115.C40D21F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox