From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paulos Yibelo" <habte.yibelo@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: validate virtio checksum start after network header
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:47:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921004754.DDA031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920004733.6473-2-habte.yibelo@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net: virtio_net_hdr_to_skb security check bypassed for TUN devices
--
commit 1c7e0adac42db0550277cf456f6845d512993ef1
Author: Paulos Yibelo <habte.yibelo@gmail.com>
net: validate virtio checksum start after network header
__virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() rejects a CHECKSUM_PARTIAL start smaller than an
estimated minimum network-header length. The comparison currently uses the
offset from skb->data rather than the offset from skb_network_header().
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> index c381b916c1b54..a95ad465b9887 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ static inline int __virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, start, off))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (skb_transport_offset(skb) < nh_min_len)
> + if (skb_transport_offset(skb) < nh_min_len ||
> + skb_transport_offset(skb) - skb_network_offset(skb) < nh_min_len)
[Severity: High]
Does this check get bypassed for TUN/TAP devices?
Looking at drivers/net/tun.c:tun_get_user(), the virtio_net_hdr parsing is
invoked before the network header is reset:
drivers/net/tun.c:tun_get_user() {
...
if (tun_vnet_hdr_tnl_to_skb(tun->flags, features, skb, &hdr)) {
atomic_long_inc(&tun->rx_frame_errors);
err = -EINVAL;
goto free_skb;
}
...
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
...
}
Because skb->network_header is uninitialized when __virtio_net_hdr_to_skb()
is called, it retains its 0 value from allocation. This causes
skb_network_offset(skb) to evaluate to a negative value, such as -64 for
prepad bytes.
The new check then simplifies to start + prepad < nh_min_len. Since prepad
is typically >= 32 and nh_min_len is usually around 20, this comparison is
always false. This completely bypasses the security check and leaves TUN/TAP
devices vulnerable to the memory corruption this patch intends to fix.
While a subsequent patch in the series mitigates the consequence for IPv4 in
ip_do_fragment(), are other paths like IPv6 fragmentation via ip6_fragment()
still fully exposed to this bypass?
> return -EINVAL;
>
> nh_min_len = skb_transport_offset(skb);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260920004733.6473-1-habte.yibelo@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 0:47 [PATCH net v4 0/2] net: prevent partial checksums from modifying IPv4 headers Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-20 0:47 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: validate virtio checksum start after network header Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-20 1:11 ` David Ahern
2026-09-21 0:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-20 0:47 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] ipv4: reject partial checksums covering the IP header Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-20 1:12 ` David Ahern
2026-09-21 0:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 2:53 ` [PATCH net v5 0/2] net: prevent partial checksums from modifying network headers Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-21 2:53 ` [PATCH net v5 1/2] net: validate virtio checksum start after network header Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-21 3:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 22:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-21 22:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-21 22:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-22 0:55 ` Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-24 8:54 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-21 2:53 ` [PATCH net v5 2/2] ip: reject partial checksums covering network headers Paulos Yibelo
2026-09-21 3:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 8:54 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921004754.DDA031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=habte.yibelo@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox