Linux virtualization list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anlai Lu" <agicy@qq.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] iommu/virtio: publish the endpoint before replaying it
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:09:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004130950.DD1B51F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_D1D6479CD59F6E5CED7C653937DE66C73106@qq.com>

> The device drops a domain's mappings together with its last endpoint, so
> the first endpoint attaching to a domain has to replay them. The driver
> published that endpoint only after the replay (nr_endpoints++, without a
> lock), while viommu_map_pages() used the same counter, also without a
> lock, to decide whether to queue its own MAP or leave it to the replay. A
> map_pages() landing after the replay's walk had passed its range and
> before the counter was bumped was therefore queued by nobody: the mapping
> stayed in the driver's tree and never reached the device, silently, until
> the domain was detached and attached again - DMA to it faults in the
> meantime.
> 
> Publish the endpoint first, with the decision moved into
> viommu_add_mapping() under mappings_lock so that it cannot race the
> insert, and let the replay pick up the rest. A mapping that such a race
> sends while the replay walks it is on the device twice, which the spec says
> [ ... ]
> change the device ends with exactly the mappings the driver believes in,
> in every run.
> 
> Fixes: edcd69ab9a32 ("iommu: Add virtio-iommu driver")
> Signed-off-by: Anlai Lu <agicy@qq.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/tencent_D757B544955DDC509B5DC7161F425620BA08@qq.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-04 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 12:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] iommu/virtio: batch the mapping replay Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iommu/virtio: publish the endpoint before replaying it Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:09   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iommu/virtio: queue an UNMAP for every removed mapping Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iommu/virtio: allocate the UNMAP request with the mapping Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iommu/virtio: stop queueing and draining once the device is removed Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iommu/virtio: read the endpoint count under the lock in the iotlb paths Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iommu/virtio: batch the mapping replay on domain attach Anlai Lu
2026-10-04 13:08   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261004130950.DD1B51F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agicy@qq.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox