From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Daehyeon Ko" <4ncienth@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] vhost/vsock: size receive SKBs from declared payload
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 23:56:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004235619.C64811F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004235101.1464007-1-4ncienth@gmail.com>
> vhost_vsock_alloc_skb() sizes the skb from iov_length(), the total guest
> descriptor length. virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt() instead adds hdr->len to
> rx_bytes and buf_used, and budgets each queued skb as SKB_TRUESIZE(0). The
> guest controls the descriptor length and hdr->len independently.
>
> A guest can therefore provide a 64 KiB descriptor while declaring a zero
> payload. The descriptor-sized skb remains queued, rx_bytes and buf_used
> remain unchanged, and only the fixed queue-entry budget limits retention.
> This is not a lifetime leak: the skb is freed when dequeued or at socket
> teardown. Repeating this across connections can nevertheless exhaust host
> memory. On Linux v7.2, 455 such descriptors retained 30,255,680 bytes for
> a 262,144-byte receive buffer; a full-payload control retained 265,984
> bytes.
>
> Vhost previously read hdr->len and allocated pkt->buf from that value. The
> conversion from virtio_vsock_pkt to sk_buff instead allocated receive skbs
> from the descriptor length, introducing the allocation-accounting mismatch.
>
> Copy the header into a stack object and validate hdr->len before allocating
> the skb. Size the allocation as sizeof(hdr) + payload_len so descriptor
> capacity no longer determines queued memory. Check payload_len against
> len - sizeof(hdr) to avoid addition overflow on 32-bit hosts.
>
> Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004235101.1464007-1-4ncienth@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 23:51 [PATCH net v3] vhost/vsock: size receive SKBs from declared payload Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-04 23:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261004235619.C64811F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox