From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Val Packett" <val@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: do not enforce blob_alignment in cross-domain contexts
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:53:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006005352.77E821F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006004044.2242154-1-val@invisiblethingslab.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] drm/virtio: NULL pointer dereference in verify_blob() when 3D features are disabled
- [Medium] drm/virtio: data race when reading vfpriv->context_init in verify_blob()
--
commit e614dba4f51f24b9effac7458783e310e89be777
Author: Val Packett <val@invisiblethingslab.com>
drm/virtio: do not enforce blob_alignment in cross-domain contexts
The commit prevents enforcing blob_alignment requirements in cross-domain
contexts, as resources created there are arbitrary shared system memory files
like Wayland keymaps.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ static int verify_blob(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
> params->blob_hints = rc_blob->blob_hints;
>
> if (vgdev->has_blob_alignment &&
> + (vfpriv->context_init & VIRTIO_GPU_CONTEXT_INIT_CAPSET_ID_MASK) !=
> + VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_CROSS_DOMAIN &&
[Severity: Critical]
If a virtio-gpu device advertises VIRTIO_GPU_F_RESOURCE_BLOB and
VIRTIO_GPU_F_BLOB_ALIGNMENT but not VIRTIO_GPU_F_VIRGL, could this cause a
NULL pointer dereference?
In this scenario, virtio_gpu_driver_open() returns successfully but leaves
file->driver_priv (which is passed as vfpriv) as NULL. When userspace then
calls DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_RESOURCE_CREATE_BLOB with VIRTGPU_BLOB_MEM_GUEST,
verify_blob() is reached without aborting on the has_virgl_3d check.
This newly added code will then unconditionally dereference
vfpriv->context_init because vgdev->has_blob_alignment is true, causing a
kernel panic. Is there a way to verify vfpriv is not NULL before accessing
context_init?
[Severity: Medium]
Does this introduce a data race when reading context_init?
This accesses the lock-protected context_init field without acquiring
vfpriv->context_lock. A lockless read of context_init could read a partially
written bitmask if updated concurrently, leading to incorrectly enforcing or
bypassing blob alignment checks and returning spurious -EINVAL to userspace.
This could happen if userspace calls DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_CONTEXT_INIT and
DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_RESOURCE_CREATE_BLOB concurrently on the same file
descriptor.
> !IS_ALIGNED(params->size, vgdev->blob_alignment))
> return -EINVAL;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006004044.2242154-1-val@invisiblethingslab.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 0:34 [PATCH] drm/virtio: do not enforce blob_alignment in cross-domain contexts Val Packett
2026-10-06 0:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006005352.77E821F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=val@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox