From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29e40dbb-8baf-45fa-a7e8-30c4a2cc90d4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c4f1284-77d2-4628-88bc-28677afd2238@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]
On 31.03.26 23:41, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/20/26 23:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> I think this should be the first step towards a MSR access
>> consolidation, as it allows any internal optimizations and changes
>> without further bothering most of the users.
> I'm not opposed to something more thorough than these 8 patches. But,
> these do fix real problems. Would they make some future effort harder?
I would need to rebase my paravirt MSR series, but this isn't a blocker.
Maybe I will need to undo some of your changes and fix the underlying
problem differently, but this is fine for me. In the end I believe your
series and the one I was proposing above wouldn't interfere a lot. It is
the layer between both (my paravirt MSR work) which would be affected
most, but this series might need more work anyway.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 19:03 [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/msr: Use "raw_" names for calls to native_* functions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr() definitions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsrq() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/msr: Consolidate {rd,wr}msr[q]_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdpmc() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/msr: Remove old crusty comment Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/msr: Remove duplicate #include Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 23:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Borislav Petkov
2026-03-20 23:39 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-21 6:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-03-23 15:22 ` Juergen Gross
2026-03-31 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2026-04-01 6:12 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2026-03-31 21:37 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29e40dbb-8baf-45fa-a7e8-30c4a2cc90d4@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox