public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xie Yongji" <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Anders Roxell" <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	"Marco Crivellari" <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vduse: fix compat handling for VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD/VDUSE_VQ_GET_INFO
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:59:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30db98bd-8361-46f5-aec1-ffbc4e8574dd@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWeJs4u6G46gEg=-G6o3u6LsgzVC03fTGR=O_qd_HujLuw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 2, 2026, at 12:34, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 11:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> These two ioctls are incompatible on 32-bit x86 userspace, because
>> the data structures are shorter than they are on 64-bit.
>>
>> Add compad handling to the regular ioctl handler to just handle
>> them the same way and ignore the extra padding. This could be
>> done in a separate .compat_ioctl handler, but the main one already
>> handles two versions of VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD, so adding a third one
>> fits in rather well.
>>
>
> I'm just learning about the COMPAT_ stuff but does this mean the
> userland app need to call a different ioctl depending if it is
> compiled for 32 bits or 64 bits? I guess it is not the case, but how
> is that handled?

In a definition like

#define VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD      _IOWR(VDUSE_BASE, 0x10, struct vduse_iotlb_entry)

The resulting integer value encodes sizeof(struct vduse_iotlb_entry)
in some of the bits. Since x86-32 and x86-64 have different
sizes for this particular structure, the command codes are
different for the same macro. The recommendation from 
Documentation/driver-api/ioctl.rst is to use structures with
a consistent layout across all architectures to avoid that.

The normal way to handle this once it has gone wrong is to split
out the actual handler into a function that takes the kernel
structure, and a .compat_ioctl() handler that copies the
32-bit structure to the stack in the correct format.

Since the v1 structures here are /almost/ compatible aside from
the padding at the end, my patch here takes a shortcut and does
not add a custom .compat_ioctl handler but instead changes
the native version on x86-64 to deal with both layouts.
This does mean that the kernel driver now also accepts the
64-bit layout coming from compat tasks, and the compat layout
coming from 64-bit tasks.

Nothing in userspace changes, as it still just uses the existing
VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD macro, and the kernel continues to handle
the native layout as before.

    Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-02  9:59 [PATCH 1/2] vduse: avoid adding implicit padding Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-02  9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] vduse: fix compat handling for VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD/VDUSE_VQ_GET_INFO Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-02 11:34   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-02-02 11:59     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-02-02 16:45       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-02 22:54         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-03 10:35           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-03 14:13             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-02-03 14:41               ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-03 15:03                 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-02-02 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] vduse: avoid adding implicit padding Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-02-02 11:50   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-02-02 12:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-03  7:00       ` Eugenio Perez Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30db98bd-8361-46f5-aec1-ffbc4e8574dd@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox