# QXL DRM: `apply_reloc` and `apply_surf_reloc` write to `info->dst_offset` without validating against BO size ## Summary The QXL DRM driver's relocation processing in `drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c` writes 64-bit and 32-bit values to `reloc_page + (info->dst_offset & ~PAGE_MASK)` after mapping `info->dst_offset & PAGE_MASK` into kernel space via `qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page`. The `dst_offset` is taken verbatim from the user-supplied `drm_qxl_reloc` ioctl argument and is never validated against the destination buffer object's size before the write. An aspirational comment at the top of `apply_reloc` explicitly notes that "`dst` must be validated, i.e. whole bo on vram/surfacesram", but the validation has not been implemented since the driver was introduced in 2013. ## Impact This is **not** a host-VM-escape primitive (the writes hit guest-controlled VRAM emulated by QEMU, not host kernel memory). It is a **guest-side memory corruption** primitive: - A guest userspace process with `DRM_AUTH` (any logged-in user) can write attacker-chosen 64-bit/32-bit values to arbitrary offsets within the QXL VRAM aperture. - Targets reachable within the aperture include other guest processes' QXL buffer objects, QXL release-command BOs queued for the host, and ring buffers that QEMU consumes. - Corrupting QXL command structures that QEMU/SPICE then parses **moves the attack surface** to QEMU's QXL parser (separate codebase; historically vulnerable). This kernel bug is therefore a viable priming primitive for a guest-to-host escape chain whose terminal step lives in QEMU. CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write). Realistic CVSS 3.1: `AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H` ≈ **5.5 Medium** for the kernel-side bug in isolation. If chained with a QEMU QXL parser bug: higher. This is submitted as **hardening / defense-in-depth**, not as a self-contained RCE/VM-escape claim. ## Affected versions Linux mainline HEAD (audited 2026-05-13). The pattern is unchanged since the QXL DRM driver merged in v3.10 (2013). Commit history is sparse on this file; the issue is structural. ## Vulnerable code `drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c:73-110`: ```c struct qxl_reloc_info { int type; struct qxl_bo *dst_bo; uint32_t dst_offset; /* <-- user-controlled, copied from drm_qxl_reloc.dst_offset (__u64) */ struct qxl_bo *src_bo; int src_offset; }; /* * dst must be validated, i.e. whole bo on vram/surfacesram (right now all bo's * are on vram). * *(dst + dst_off) = qxl_bo_physical_address(src, src_off) */ static void apply_reloc(struct qxl_device *qdev, struct qxl_reloc_info *info) { void *reloc_page; reloc_page = qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page(qdev, info->dst_bo, info->dst_offset & PAGE_MASK); *(uint64_t *)(reloc_page + (info->dst_offset & ~PAGE_MASK)) = qxl_bo_physical_address(qdev, info->src_bo, info->src_offset); qxl_bo_kunmap_atomic_page(qdev, info->dst_bo, reloc_page); } ``` `apply_surf_reloc` (Lines 98-110) has the identical pattern for a `uint32_t` write. ### How `dst_offset` reaches `apply_reloc` The user-space struct is defined in `include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h`: ```c struct drm_qxl_reloc { __u64 src_offset; __u64 dst_offset; /* user-controlled */ __u32 src_handle; __u32 dst_handle; __u32 reloc_type; __u32 pad; }; ``` `qxl_process_single_command` (`qxl_ioctl.c:141-269`) copies the user `drm_qxl_reloc` array into `reloc_info`, narrows `dst_offset` from `__u64` to `uint32_t` (silent truncation -- still gives the attacker the full 32-bit / 4 GB range), and then calls `apply_reloc`/`apply_surf_reloc`. No bounds check against `dst_bo->tbo.base.size` exists anywhere in the call chain. `qxl_release_reserve_list` only handles TTM placement validation. ### Mapping behaviour `qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page` (`drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c`) computes `offset = (bo->tbo.resource->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + page_offset` and maps via `io_mapping_map_atomic_wc` on the QXL device's full VRAM aperture (`vram_mapping`). The `BUG_ON(offset >= mapping->size)` inside `io_mapping_map_atomic_wc` (see `include/linux/io-mapping.h`) only fires if the offset exceeds the *entire* aperture, not the specific BO. Writes within the aperture but outside the BO succeed and land on whatever data occupies those pages. ## Proposed fix Add the validation the comment promised, in the per-reloc-info-fill loop in `qxl_process_single_command` (around line 228-244): ```c + if (reloc_info[i].type == QXL_RELOC_TYPE_BO && + (reloc_info[i].dst_offset + sizeof(uint64_t) > reloc_info[i].dst_bo->tbo.base.size || + reloc_info[i].dst_offset > U32_MAX - sizeof(uint64_t))) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_free_bos; + } + if (reloc_info[i].type == QXL_RELOC_TYPE_SURF && + (reloc_info[i].dst_offset + sizeof(uint32_t) > reloc_info[i].dst_bo->tbo.base.size || + reloc_info[i].dst_offset > U32_MAX - sizeof(uint32_t))) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_free_bos; + } ``` Equivalent to checking `dst_offset` plus the write size fits inside the resolved BO. Also enforce a reasonable upper bound on `cmd->relocs_num` to prevent allocation DoS. ## Discovery Static analysis of QXL DRM ioctl handlers. ## Disclosure Per Linux kernel security policy, report to `security@kernel.org` and the QXL maintainers (Gerd Hoffmann, virtualization@lists.linux.dev).