public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	nbd@other.debian.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 17:36:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fb212e4-8fff-45fc-9cff-f5b5eaff4231@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106110532.GA22062@lst.de>



On 1/6/25 4:35 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 04:31:23PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>>> +static bool bdev_can_poll(struct block_device *bdev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>>> +
>>> +	if (queue_is_mq(q))
>>> +		return blk_mq_can_poll(q->tag_set);
>>> +	return q->limits.features & BLK_FEAT_POLL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> Should we make bdev_can_poll() inline ?
> 
> I don't really see the point.  It's file local and doesn't have any
> magic that could confuse the code generator, so we might as well leave
> it to the compiler.  Although that might be about to change per the
> discussion with Damien, which could require it in blk-sysfs, in
> which case it should become an inline in a header.
> 
Oh yes, I saw that you moved blk_mq_can_poll() to blk-mq.h and 
made it inline so thought why bdev_can_poll() can't be made inline?
BTW, bdev_can_poll() is  called from IO fastpath and so making it inline 
may slightly improve performance. 
On another note, I do see that blk_mq_can_poll() is now only called 
from bdev_can_poll(). So you may want to merge these two functions 
in a single call and make that inline.

Thanks,
--Nilay

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-06 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06 10:06 RFC: fix queue freeze and limit locking order (alt take) Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:39   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:41   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:46   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: use queue_limits_commit_update in queue_attr_store Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:48   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:55   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 11:01   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-06 11:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 12:06       ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-01-06 15:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  7:06           ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] virtio_blk: use queue_limits_commit_update_frozen in cache_type_store Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:56   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 13:09       ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 15:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] usb-storage: use queue_limits_commit_update_frozen in max_sectors_store Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] nvme: freeze queue after taking limits lock Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] loop: document why loop_clear_limits updates queue limits without freezing Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] nbd: use queue_limits_commit_update_frozen in nbd_set_size Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fb212e4-8fff-45fc-9cff-f5b5eaff4231@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox