* paravirt_ops xen booting
@ 2006-09-20 0:11 Chris Wright
2006-09-20 0:30 ` Zachary Amsden
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2006-09-20 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Virtualization Mailing List, Rusty Russell, Chris Wright,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge, Andrew Morton, Nivedita Singhvi, Andi Kleen,
Zachary Amsden
Just a note to let you know we've got domU booting with paravirt_ops
XenoLinux. There's still some minor cleanups to do:
- soft watchdog firing
- inconsistent device probing
- console on tty1
Then onto smp support, and removing the rest of the limitations
of the current patchset.
thanks,
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: paravirt_ops xen booting
2006-09-20 0:11 paravirt_ops xen booting Chris Wright
@ 2006-09-20 0:30 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-20 1:02 ` Chris Wright
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zachary Amsden @ 2006-09-20 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Virtualization Mailing List
Chris Wright wrote:
> Just a note to let you know we've got domU booting with paravirt_ops
> XenoLinux. There's still some minor cleanups to do:
>
> - soft watchdog firing
> - inconsistent device probing
> - console on tty1
>
> Then onto smp support, and removing the rest of the limitations
> of the current patchset.
>
Congrats! ¡Mucho dolce vitale!
Should we just allow paravirt to disable soft watchdog? It really
doesn't make a lot of sense for paravirt - it should be the hypervisor's
responsibility, and it can break easily across discontinuous time jumps.
Zach
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: paravirt_ops xen booting
2006-09-20 0:30 ` Zachary Amsden
@ 2006-09-20 1:02 ` Chris Wright
2006-09-20 1:45 ` Zachary Amsden
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2006-09-20 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zachary Amsden; +Cc: Chris Wright, Virtualization Mailing List, Andrew Morton
> Should we just allow paravirt to disable soft watchdog? It really
> doesn't make a lot of sense for paravirt - it should be the hypervisor's
> responsibility, and it can break easily across discontinuous time jumps.
Sorry, I meant soft lockup detection.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: paravirt_ops xen booting
2006-09-20 1:02 ` Chris Wright
@ 2006-09-20 1:45 ` Zachary Amsden
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zachary Amsden @ 2006-09-20 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Virtualization Mailing List
Chris Wright wrote:
>> Should we just allow paravirt to disable soft watchdog? It really
>> doesn't make a lot of sense for paravirt - it should be the hypervisor's
>> responsibility, and it can break easily across discontinuous time jumps.
>>
>
> Sorry, I meant soft lockup detection.
>
So did I ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-20 1:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-20 0:11 paravirt_ops xen booting Chris Wright
2006-09-20 0:30 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-20 1:02 ` Chris Wright
2006-09-20 1:45 ` Zachary Amsden
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).