From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:59:51 -0800 Message-ID: <454D6FC7.3040308@vmware.com> References: <20061029024504.760769000@sous-sol.org> <200611030356.54074.ak@suse.de> <454BA7F7.8030205@vmware.com> <200611032209.40235.ak@suse.de> <1162701815.29777.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1162701815.29777.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Rusty Russell wrote: > Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in > rc4-mm2. There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically > sound. > > At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches > up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your > tree. > = This begs the question - should we rebase the paravirt-ops patchset = against -rc4-mm2? I almost did it today, but didn't want to stomp on = anybody else's toes. Zach