From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: how set_pte_at()'s vaddr and ptep args relate Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:18:13 -0800 Message-ID: <45523B85.1080004@goop.org> References: <4552371C.8050901@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4552371C.8050901@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Chris Wright , Virtualization Mailing List , Keir Fraser List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Do you mean the tlb entry gets invalidated as part of raising the = > fault? > = Specifically, does it simply invalidate the TLB at that point, or does = it re-walk the page table and populate it with the new PTE? J