From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:21:00 -0800 Message-ID: <455ACDEC.7010808@vmware.com> References: <200610200009.k9K09MrS027558@zach-dev.vmware.com> <20061027145650.GA37582@muc.de> <45425976.3090508@vmware.com> <200610271416.12548.ak@suse.de> <4546669F.8020706@vmware.com> <20061030225016.GA95732@muc.de> <20061115080323.GK1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061115080323.GK1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Chris Wright Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Chris Wright wrote: > * Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de) wrote: > = >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:54:55PM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: >> = >>> Andi Kleen wrote: >>> = >>>> no_timer_check. But it's only there on x86-64 in mainline - although t= here >>>> were some patches to add it to i386 too. >>>> = >>>> = >>> I can rename to match the x86-64 name. >>> = >> I will do that in my tree. >> = > > Looks like this one might have been lost. Here's the renamed version > (it's against 2.6.19-rc5-mm2, which should have your tree in it). > > thanks, > -chris > = Thanks Chris, this is definitely a required patch for us. I'm a little worried after seeing failures to apply and missed patches = that we could have other things missing from the upstream path. Is = there an easy way for us to look at diffs between the trees? Just a = diff on arch/i386 and include/asm-i386 would tell me wonders, no matter = how much extra activity has gone on there. Namaste, Zach