From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:13:35 -0800 Message-ID: <455C018F.9000304@vmware.com> References: <200610200009.k9K09MrS027558@zach-dev.vmware.com> <20061027145650.GA37582@muc.de> <45425976.3090508@vmware.com> <200610271416.12548.ak@suse.de> <4546669F.8020706@vmware.com> <20061030225016.GA95732@muc.de> <20061115080323.GK1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <455ACDEC.7010808@vmware.com> <20061115224053.GO1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20061116032702.GH9579@bingen.suse.de> <20061115210630.94bf8824.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061115210630.94bf8824.akpm@osdl.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Andrew Morton wrote: > wtf? How come patches leave here in working order and keep arriving brok= en Patchworms? Quilt moths? Or perhaps, leaf cutting ants - they only = have a 50% success rate at holding on to the proper bits because they = are unaware of the physical geometry of the leaf in relationship to the = branch, so half the time they hold onto the wrong side, letting the = leaf fall instead of bringing it back to the repository. Zach