From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Paravirt-ops VMI / Xen / lrustyvisor merge status
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:10:27 -0800
Message-ID: <45CC1053.9080501@goop.org>
References: <45CC0672.7090201@vmware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <45CC0672.7090201@vmware.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Chris / Jeremy - perhaps I missed it, but I haven't seen updated Xen
> paravirt-ops patches go out yet - is 2.6.21 still the merge target?

Yes.  I spent today updating to address the review comments, and I think
Chris is in the process of rebasing to .20 for a repost soon (tomorrow?).

> I don't want to be pushy, but I do want our code to get merged, and
> time's a ticking.

Me too.  I'm eager to be getting on to something else (which probably
means SMP at this point).

    J