From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: Paravirt-ops VMI / Xen / lrustyvisor merge status Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:12:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45CC10B7.2060100@vmware.com> References: <45CC0672.7090201@vmware.com> <1171000474.2718.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1171000474.2718.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Chris Wright , Virtualization Mailing List , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Rusty, you mentioned you had a patchset to push, when do you expect to = >> have it ready? >> = > > I'm just doing the final file moving now (everything in > arch/i386/lguest), expect to send out something within 48 hours (I need > to sync up to latest git tree, too). > = Cool. > = >> One of which is separating the paravirt-ops into GPL = >> and non-GPL exports, which we need consensus on where the line is, but = >> can't really achieve it until everyone is happy with the finalized set = >> of paravirt-ops. Any patch that tries to do this now would just cause = >> rejects later and slow all of our merges. >> = > > Yes, I have a patch, but it breaks kvm. I'm waiting until things settle > before fixing it. > = I think the only other open issue we had was how to cleanly do the = sysenter disable for Xen. We want it on for sure, and so does native, = but Xen needs to disable it. This could be tied into some nosegneg = stuff, I can't remember exactly if they were separate patches or what = happened to the nosegneg stuff. Presumedly, Xen still needs that as well? Zach