From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/10] lguest code: the little linux hypervisor. Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:54:37 -0800 Message-ID: <45CC60FD.6080606@vmware.com> References: <1171012296.2718.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171018812.2718.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45CC5771.1070309@vmware.com> <200702091250.06482.ak@muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200702091250.06482.ak@muc.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Rusty Russell , Paul Mackerras , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , lkml - Kernel Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Andi Kleen wrote: >> Yes, it is a bit, umm, innovative. If it is going to be kept, even if >> just for devel logging, you should disable interrupts around it. >> Changing segments is not a normal thing to do. >> > > Actually that wouldn't be needed because interrupts are not allowed to do any > user accesses. And contrary to the name it doesn't actually change > the segment registers, only state used by *_user. > My bad, I fell for the same mistake as everyone. Set_fs is just way too confusing of a name now. But good to know interrupts must be disable in such a circumstance. Zach