From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:52:06 -0800 Message-ID: <45D3BCC6.9020807@goop.org> References: <20070213221729.772002682@goop.org> <20070213221830.707197267@goop.org> <20070213235424.GA1908@muc.de> <45D35ABE.1050504@goop.org> <45D3740A.4080600@goop.org> <45D3A5A4.7080804@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , Andi Kleen List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Reasonable and it's probably worth letting the binutils developer know. > I do agree that it is weird. It might be that something in binutils > doesn't like us dropping some of the notes. > What do you mean by "dropping some of the notes"? I think the only notes (at least in this case) are the Xen ones, and they're all included. J