From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:26:33 -0800 Message-ID: <45D60569.2050702@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Beulich , Chris Wright , Ian Pratt , Andrew Morton , Keir Fraser , Andi Kleen List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Keir Fraser wrote: > Hmmm... Actually looks like a bunch of architectures do lazy sync of the > vmalloc area, although neither ia64 nor powerpc does so. However, all > current users of the alloc_vm_area() function would be okay since none of > the other lazy-syncing architectures are supported by Xen. > Well, assuming that alloc_vm_area() has some non-Xen use, the right thing is for archs to export vmalloc_sync_all(), and just use that from common code. J