From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 05/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Add pagetable accessors to pack and unpack pagetable entries Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:20:56 -0800 Message-ID: <45DCC5C8.4090905@goop.org> References: <20070221205254.169835700@goop.org> <20070221205322.869165491@goop.org> <200702212315.12883.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200702212315.12883.ak@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Andi Kleen Cc: Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Andi Kleen wrote: > Do you have some lmbench numbers before/after this change? > iirc at least fork and exit do a lot of pte accesses in various forms. > If it's measurable it might be needed to patch those for the native case. > I don't. I think Rusty ran some numbers and found the pte accessors became the most commonly used paravirt ops. I'm working on revamping the pv_ops patching infrastructure at the moment, so we should be able to deal with these fairly efficiently. J