From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 10/21] Xen-paravirt: add hooks to intercept mm creation and destruction Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:21:33 -0800 Message-ID: <45DDFB4D.9050809@goop.org> References: <20070216022449.739760547@goop.org> <20070216022531.267584466@goop.org> <20070222201644.GA4938@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070222201644.GA4938@ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Pavel Machek Cc: Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > >> @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ struct paravirt_ops >> void (*io_delay)(void); >> void (*const_udelay)(unsigned long loops); >> >> + void (fastcall *activate_mm)(struct mm_struct *prev, >> + struct mm_struct *next); >> + void (fastcall *dup_mmap)(struct mm_struct *oldmm, >> + struct mm_struct *mm); >> + void (fastcall *exit_mmap)(struct mm_struct *mm); >> + >> > > Why the fastcall stuff? Why is io_delay different from activate_mm in > this regard? > That's crud; I forgot to remove it. Everything is effectively fastcall now that -mregparm=3 is always on. J