From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: Where does vmi_apply_boot_page_allocations ever get called? Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:00:40 -0800 Message-ID: <45E6A448.8090101@vmware.com> References: <45E69FAA.7080008@goop.org> <45E6A0CB.8050405@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45E6A0CB.8050405@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Virtualization Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > = >> Because I need a hook for "do stuff after mem_map is valid" too. >> = We didn't add a hook, but I can say it was somewhere in = arch/i386/kernel/setup.c - should be after zone_sizes_init(). I'm no longer sure how to resurrect the original debug code, but it is = still too useful to jettison at this point. It was difficult to get all = the nuances right.. > > Oh, #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_TYPE. I was wondering when struct page > grew a "type" field. > = Yeah, this was private debugging for verifying that page typing was = always accurate. Turned off because we couldn't justify taking a struct = page field. Zach