From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: system call time increase when turning on CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:16:57 -0800
Message-ID: <45E8BE79.40200@goop.org>
References: <1172866274.4898.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>	
	<45E89CFB.4090905@goop.org>
	<1172877111.8383.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <1172877111.8383.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

Tim Chen wrote:
> I also hope that the performance can be recovered as this option could
> enabled in distributions' kernels in future.

Yes, the intent is that running a CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernel on native
hardware will have negligible performance hit compared to running a
non-paravirt kernel.

    J