From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] Vmi fix highpte Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:58:22 -0800 Message-ID: <45E92A9E.6030108@vmware.com> References: <200703020254.l222smBB009668@zach-dev.vmware.com> <45E79529.9000305@goop.org> <45E79C72.4000806@goop.org> <45E7C4DD.1040403@vmware.com> <45E7C80E.1020107@goop.org> <45E7F405.6020507@vmware.com> <45E8571F.1050509@goop.org> <45E920F6.7060806@vmware.com> <45E9273A.4040300@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45E9273A.4040300@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Virtualization Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > I can deal with the change going into -git, but it does seem awkward > knowing that it is the wrong change and it will be replaced by something > else almost immediately. > = Well, it is not quite wrong - it is appropriate for -git. That it will = be replaced soon is a minor thing, as long as we can work together to = make sure your patches are unaffected. > My main concern is that the Xen patch queue is complex enough as-is, and > I've been trying hard to remove dependencies on other uncommitted > patches. It's doubly complex because I'm not really sure if I'm > targeting Andrew or Andi's tree as a base, though at the moment -git > seems to work either way. > > J > = Believe me, I understand the complexities of dealing with -mm, -git, and = -i386 trees. It's not just doubly complex, its triply so. I believe = the best approach is to make it easiest on the maintainers. So the = patch stream I am uploading through -mm, -i386, to -git does not = conflict with the Xen patch queue as long as we make sure the next = bundle to those same trees applies clean. Again, I broke the Xen patch = queue in -mm, and for that I am sorry. I will help you re-integrate = against the VMI patches I sent out, as I broke your code, I will help = fix it. And we both have a tree to work off from, which makes it rather = easy to work together ;) Cheers, Zach ---- Sutra I.2 - interruptah chittavritti nirodhah