From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:48:10 -0800 Message-ID: <45EDB76A.4050604@goop.org> References: <20070305120631.GA14105@elte.hu> <1173101297.26165.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1173142644.4644.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45ECBDDC.8080708@vmware.com> <45ECC076.9050209@goop.org> <20070306073511.GA3938@elte.hu> <45ED1B64.9040104@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45ED1B64.9040104@vmware.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Zachary Amsden Cc: virtualization , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Zachary Amsden wrote: > Yes, I don't have a problem with your patch, I just wish I had been > cc'd on it. Fixing this is rather tricky, but I believe no strange > build magic is required, it can be done in kernel init code. Still > building my SUSE 9.0 guest to test. SUSE 9.0 is one of those that > requires COMPAT_VDSO, yes? Where do we stand on VDSO reloc? Are you turning this into a proper patch, or shall I have a look at it? J