From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:49:36 -0800
Message-ID: <45EF2560.7090104@vmware.com>
References: <200703060654.l266sVxr014860@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>	<45ED16D2.3000202@vmware.com>
	<20070306084258.GA15745@elte.hu>	<20070306084647.GA16280@elte.hu>
	<45ED2C82.3080008@vmware.com>	<1173178774.24738.311.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<45EDD82F.90204@vmware.com>	<1173225182.24738.507.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<45EE0628.1080108@goop.org>
	<45EE08E8.2020008@vmware.com>	<1173228544.24738.514.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<45EE0D10.7070807@vmware.com>	<1173230305.24738.529.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<45EE1EA3.90803@vmware.com>	<1173256666.24738.576.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<45EEF966.6060902@goop.org>	<Line.LNX.4.64.0703071304080.1851@d.namei>
	<45EF0CF5.5090305@goop.org> <45EF175D.6030609@vmware.com>
	<45EF1C80.50900@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <45EF1C80.50900@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>, tglx@linutronix.de, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On 03/07/2007 12:11 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dan Hecht wrote:
>> Jeremy, I saw you sent out the Xen version earlier, thanks.  Here's
>> ours for reference (please excuse any formating issues); it's also
>> lean. We'll send out a proper patch later after some more testing:
> =

> So the interrupt side of the clockevent comes through the virtual apic? =

> Where does evt->handle_event get called?
> =


Yeah, we use the same interrupt handlers as normal i386: timer_interrupt =

and smp_apic_timer_interrupt.  That way we don't need to duplicate the =

interrupt handler code.