From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Stolen and degraded time and schedulers Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:16:45 -0700 Message-ID: <45F8663D.5050102@goop.org> References: <45F6D1D0.6080905@goop.org> <1173816769.22180.14.camel@localhost> <45F70A71.9090205@goop.org> <1173821224.1416.24.camel@dwalker1> <45F71EA5.2090203@goop.org> <1173837606.23595.32.camel@imap.mvista.com> <45F79B9C.20609@goop.org> <1173888673.3101.12.camel@imap.mvista.com> <45F824BE.1060708@goop.org> <1173891595.3101.17.camel@imap.mvista.com> <45F82C01.3000704@goop.org> <1173895607.3101.58.camel@imap.mvista.com> <45F841EE.6060703@goop.org> <1173898800.3101.81.camel@imap.mvista.com> <45F8508F.3070109@goop.org> <1173904438.3101.92.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1173904438.3101.92.camel@imap.mvista.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: john stultz , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Con Kolivas , Rusty Russell , Zachary Amsden , James Morris , Chris Wright , Linux Kernel Mailing List , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Virtualization Mailing List , Peter Chubb List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Daniel Walker wrote: > For interactive tasks (basic scheduling) the execution time, and sleep > time need to be measured. Sleep time is interesting. It doesn't make much sense to talk about time that was stolen while a process was sleeping (it was either stolen from another running process, or the VCPU was just plain idle). Also, the definition of sched_clock I'm talking about is inherently per-cpu, and sleeping has nothing to do with any cpu by definition. So something other than sched_clock should be used to measure sleep time, but it needs to produce interval measurements which are in the same units as sched_clock. > It's also used for some posix cpu timers > (sched_ns) , and it used for migration thread initialization. sched_ns doesn't use it directly except for the case where the process is currently running. Anyway, it's compatible with what I'm talking about. > I'm sure > it's used for a variety of out-of-tree random timing as well.. > Yeah, well... J