virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>
Cc: dwalker@mvista.com, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	paulus@au.ibm.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Stolen and degraded time and schedulers
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:53:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F9A42D.7090205@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F999D4.6080602@vmware.com>

Dan Hecht wrote:
> Available time is defined to be (real_time - stolen_time).  i.e. time
> in which the vcpu is either running or not ready to run [because it is
> halted, and nothing is pending]).

Hm, the Xen definition of stolen time is "time VCPU spent in runnable
(vs running) or offline state".  If the VCPU was blocked anyway, then
its never considered to be stolen.  Offline means the VCPU was paused by
the administrator, or during suspend/resume.

    J

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13 16:31 Stolen and degraded time and schedulers Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 20:12 ` john stultz
2007-03-13 20:32   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 21:27     ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-13 21:59       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14  0:43         ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-14  4:37           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 13:58             ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 15:08               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 15:12                 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-03-14 19:02             ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-14 19:34               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 19:45                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-14 19:47                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 20:02                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-14 20:26                 ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-14 20:31                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 20:46                     ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-14 21:18                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 19:09                         ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-15 19:18                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 19:48                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-15 19:53                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-03-15 20:07                             ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-15 20:14                               ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-15 20:35                                 ` Dan Hecht
2007-03-16  8:59                                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-03-14 20:38                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 20:59                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16  8:38                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-16 16:53                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15  5:23                 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-15 19:33                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14  2:00         ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14  6:52           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 16:11             ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 16:37               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 16:59                 ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 17:08                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 18:06                     ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 18:41                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 19:00                         ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 19:44                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 20:33                             ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 21:16                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 21:34                                 ` Daniel Walker
2007-03-14 21:42                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 21:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-14 21:38   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 21:40   ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F9A42D.7090205@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@au.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).