From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 18/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Add XEN config options Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:04:13 -0700 Message-ID: <45FACE0D.4010108@goop.org> References: <20070301232443.195603797@goop.org> <20070301232528.462923016@goop.org> <20070316091454.GG23174@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070316091454.GG23174@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Christian Limpach List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >> Xen is currently incompatible with: >> - PREEMPT >> > > why? That should be fixed. Actually I don't think that's true any more. We'll need to work out how to deal with preempt and suspend/resume, but the process freezer seems like the way to do that. J