From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 03/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: use paravirt_nop to consistently mark no-op operations Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:43:44 -0700 Message-ID: <45FAE560.10401@goop.org> References: <20070301232443.195603797@goop.org> <20070301232526.261284776@goop.org> <20070316094432.GU23174@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070316094432.GU23174@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > but only as a cleanup of the current open-coded (void *) casts. My > problem with this is that it loses the types. Not that there is much to > check for, but still, this adds some assumptions about how function > calls look like. I agree. I don't generally like this kind of hack, but having a single test for "func == paravirt_nop" to look for nop pv_ops in the patcher is what tipped the balance. J