From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:46:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FAF430.4060903@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ps79m2ih.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There are three ways of finding the VDSO.
> - AT_SYSINFO
> - AT_SYSINFO_EHDR
> - known fixed address (see x86_64)
>
> Currently it doesn't sound like you need to deal with the known fixed
> address case but COMPAT_VDSO also provides that.
>
Yes, I don't think any 32-bit userspace expects a fixed address any
more. 64-bit is another matter.
> If userspace uses AT_SYSINFO the premise is that it is not expecting
> not to need to perform any relocation processing.
>
> If userspace uses AT_SYSINFO_EHDR it expects it needs to perform
> relocation processing and fixes up whatever needs fixing up.
>
Correct.
> With the module code we have shown the kernel is capable of performing
> relocation processing at times and it works.
>
Good point. It would be good to reuse that machinery.
> So is it possible to simply relocate the normal vdso and fixup
> it's program header so it shows that relocation is not necessary.
> If you can do that and still export AT_SYSINFO so the problem user
> space still runs you are good. (If you can relocate the vdso
> you should be able to relocate it anywhere).
>
Yes. The plan is to map the relocated compat vdso at some fixed address
in all processes, and map a non-relocated non-compat vdso at some
randomized address (it will probably be the same bits in either case).
We could map a relocated vdso to a randomized address (ie, only one vdso
mapping), but that would require a per-process copy of the vdso and
effort to relocate on each exec.
> Otherwise it probably just make sense to simply not export a VDSO
> on those systems.
>
We did that in an earlier version of the patch, and Ingo complained,
with some justification.
> This would leave COMPAT_VDSO for the case where you must use one magic
> fixed address, and if user space does not require that it means
> COMPAT_VDSO could be completely removed.
>
FC1 and SuSE 9 both shipped with broken glibcs which require
weak-COMPAT_VDSO (not fixed address, but pre-relocated). There are
still enough of these around that we need to cater to them.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-16 2:47 [RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16 3:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 4:03 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16 5:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 5:58 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16 8:08 ` Jan Beulich
2007-03-16 8:41 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16 16:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 17:09 ` Jan Beulich
2007-03-16 23:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-16 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 16:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-16 16:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 19:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 19:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-03-16 19:38 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45FAF430.4060903@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).