virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:46:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FAF430.4060903@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ps79m2ih.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There are three ways of finding the VDSO.
> - AT_SYSINFO
> - AT_SYSINFO_EHDR
> - known fixed address (see x86_64)
>
> Currently it doesn't sound like you need to deal with the known fixed
> address case but COMPAT_VDSO also provides that.
>   

Yes, I don't think any 32-bit userspace expects a fixed address any
more.  64-bit is another matter.

> If userspace uses AT_SYSINFO the premise is that it is not expecting
> not to need to perform any relocation processing.
>
> If userspace uses AT_SYSINFO_EHDR it expects it needs to perform
> relocation processing and fixes up whatever needs fixing up.
>   

Correct.

> With the module code we have shown the kernel is capable of performing
> relocation processing at times and it works.
>   

Good point.  It would be good to reuse that machinery.

> So is it possible to simply relocate the normal vdso and fixup
> it's program header so it shows that relocation is not necessary.
> If you can do that and still export AT_SYSINFO so the problem user
> space still runs you are good.  (If you can relocate the vdso
> you should be able to relocate it anywhere).
>   

Yes.  The plan is to map the relocated compat vdso at some fixed address
in all processes, and map a non-relocated non-compat vdso at some
randomized address (it will probably be the same bits in either case). 
We could map a relocated vdso to a randomized address (ie, only one vdso
mapping), but that would require a per-process copy of the vdso and
effort to relocate on each exec.

> Otherwise it probably just make sense to simply not export a VDSO
> on those systems.
>   

We did that in an earlier version of the patch, and Ingo complained,
with some justification.

> This would leave COMPAT_VDSO for the case where you must use one magic
> fixed address, and if user space does not require that it means
> COMPAT_VDSO could be completely removed.
>   

FC1 and SuSE 9 both shipped with broken glibcs which require
weak-COMPAT_VDSO (not fixed address, but pre-relocated).  There are
still enough of these around that we need to cater to them.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-16 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-16  2:47 [RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16  3:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16  4:03   ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16  5:10     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16  5:58       ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16  8:08       ` Jan Beulich
2007-03-16  8:41         ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-16 16:46         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 17:09           ` Jan Beulich
2007-03-16 23:09     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-16 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 16:25   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 16:31     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-16 16:33       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16 19:06         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 19:46           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-03-16 19:38   ` Zachary Amsden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45FAF430.4060903@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).