From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] percpu enable flag for softlockup watchdog Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: <46092D38.3020508@redhat.com> References: <20070327053816.881735237@goop.org> <20070327054106.809292985@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070327054106.809292985@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: john stultz , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, enabled); > = Minor nit: let's call this softlockup_enabled. Makes it easier for the = reader ;) P.