From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:29:52 -0700 Message-ID: <46159480.20108@zytor.com> References: <1174533374.2713.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46159256.1040705@zytor.com> <461592AA.4060103@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <461592AA.4060103@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: virtualization , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , lkml - Kernel Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > = > That patch got dropped, and replaced by one which pulled all the flags > definitions out of > = Saw that a little too late :) In general, it would be nice if the various CPU constants were all = defined in one place, so I'd rather suggest protecting the appropriate = parts of asm/processor.h with #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__. -hpa