From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] clean up identify_cpu Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:20:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4617D2D1.7040202@goop.org> References: <20070406224152.556848893@goop.org> <20070406224204.782242327@goop.org> <20070407021401.a993892b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070407021401.a993892b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Andrew Morton wrote: > x86_64 uses this too. > > WARNING: arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .= init.text:mtrr_bp_init from .text.identify_cpu after 'identify_cpu' (at off= set 0x655) > = OK, two patches to follow: a x86-64 variant of the bugs.h cleanup, and a replacement for this patch. I don't have a x86-64 compile environment on hand, so the 64 bits are completely untested, but they *look* they should work. J